Inelastic earthquake response of single-story asymmetric buildings: An assessment of simplified shear-beam models

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 32, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1813-1831

  Stathopoulos, K G ^a   Anagnostopoulos, S A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PATRAS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Earthquake; Inelastic; Plastic hinge; Shear beam; Torsion

Indexed keywords

DUCTILITY; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; SEISMIC PROSPECTING; SHEAR STRESS;

SHEAR-BEAM MODELS;

BUILDINGS;

BUILDING; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SHEAR; TORSION;

EID: 0141871985     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.302     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Rutenberg A. Nonlinear response of asymmetric building structures and seismic Codes: A state of the art. European Earthquake Engineering 1992; VI(2):3 19.
2. Rutenberg A. EAEE Task Group (TG) 8: Behavior of irregular and complex structures - State of the art report: seismic nonlinear response of code-designed asymmetric structures. 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 1998.
3. Tso WK, Sadek AW. Inelastic seismic response of simple eccentric structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1985: 13:255-269.
4. Tso WK, Bozorgnia Y. Effective eccentricity for inelastic seismic response of buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1986; 14:413 427.
5. Chandler AM, Duan XN. Evaluation of factors influencing the inelastic seismic performance of torsionally asymmetric buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1991; 20:87-95.
6. Goel RK, Chopra AK. Inelastic seismic response of one-storey, asymmetric-plan systems: Effects of system parameters and yielding. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1991; 20:201-222.
7. Ayala AG, Garcia O, Escobar JA. Evaluation of seismic design criteria for asymmetric buildings. 10th World Conferenee on Earthquake Engineering 1992; Vol. 10, 5693-5698.
8. Zhu TJ, Tso WK. Design of torsionally unbalanced structural systems based on code provisions II: Strength distribution. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1992: 21:629-644.
9. Stathopoulos KG, Anagnostopoulos SA. Elastic and inelastic torsion in buildings. 11th European Conference on Earthquake Enqineering, 1998.
10. Ozaki M, Azuhata T, Chen J, Soda S. Seismic design for multistory buildings with eccentricity subjected to two-directional ground motions. 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 1988: Vol. 5: 7-4-9, 233-238.
11. Correnza JC, Hutchinson GL, Chandler AM. Effect of transverse load-resisting elements on inelastic earthquake response of eccentric-plan buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1994; 23:75-90.
12. Goel R. Seismic response of asymmetric systems: Energy-based approach. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1997; 123:1444-1453.
13. Stathopoulos KG, Anagnostopoulos SA. Inelastic earthquake response of buildings subjected to torsion. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2000; id.0781.
14. Chandler AM, Duan XN, Rutenberg A. Seismic torsional response: assumptions, controversies and research progress. European Earthquake Engineering 1996; 10(l):37-51.
15. De La Colina J. Effects of torsion factors on simple non-linear systems using fully bidirectional analyses. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28:691-706.
16. Humar J, Kumar P. A new look at the torsion design provisions in seismic building codes. 12th World Conference an Earthquake Engineering. 2000: id.1707.
17. Tso WK, Smith RSH. Re-evaluation of seismic torsional provisions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999: 28:899-917.
18. Anagnostopoulos SA. Non-linear dynamic response and ductility requirements of building structures subjected to earthquakes. Report No. R72-54, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Civil Engineering Dept, 1972, U.S.A.
19. Anagnostopoulos SA, Roesset JM, Biggs JM. Non-linear dynamic analysis of buildings with torsional effects. 5th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 1973, Rome, Italy.
20. Ghersi A. Marino E, Rossi PP. From one-story to multistory asymmetric systems: conceptual differences and problems. 2nd European Workshop on the Seismic Behavior of Asymmetric and Setback Structures, 1999, Istanbul, Turkey.
21. Stathopoulos KG. Investigation of the inelastic response and earthquake resistant design of asymmetric buildings. PhD Dissertation 2001; University of Patras, Greece (in Greek).
22. EC8 - Eurocode 8. Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures. Eur. Prestandard, CEN 1994; Doc.CEN/TC250/SC8/N.
23. UBC-1997. Uniform Building Code. International Conference of Building Officials, 1997; Whittier. California, U.S.A.
24. NEAK. New Greek Code for earthquake resistant design. Greek Ministry of Environment, City Planning and Public Works, 1995, Greece.
25. Otani A. Inelastic analysis of R/C frame structures. Journal of the Structural Division (ASCE) 1974: 100: 1433-1449.
26. Park YJ, Ang AMS. Mechanistic seismic damage model of reinforced concrete. Journal of the Structural Division (ASCE) 1985; 111(4):722-739.
27. Karabalis DL, Cokkinides GJ. Rizos DC, Mulliken JS, Chen R. An interactive computer code for generation of artificial earthquake records. Computing in Civil Engineering, Khozeimeh K (ed.). ASEE, 1994;1122-1155.
28. Panagiotakos TB, Stathopoulos KG. ANSRDYN - A program for non-linear static, modal and dynamic analysis of three-dimensional structures - User's manual. Civil Engineering Dept, University of Patras, 2000, Patras, Greece.
29. Annigeri S, Mittal AK, Jain AK. Uncoupled frequency ratio in asymmetric buildings, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1996; 25:871-881.
30. Anagnostopoulos SA. Inelastic beams for seismic analyses of structures. Journal of the Structural Division (ASCE) 1981; 107:1297-1311.
31. Fardis MN. Damage measures and failure criteria for reinforced concrete members. 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 1995, Vol. 2, 1377-1382.