Structural impedance based damage diagnosis by piezo-transducers

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 32, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1897-1916

  Bhalla, Suresh ^a   Soh, Chee Kiong ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Damage; Electro mechanical impedance (EMI) method; Piezoelectric ceramic (PZT) patch; Structural health monitoring (SHM); Structural impedance

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; PIEZOELECTRIC TRANSDUCERS; VIBRATION MEASUREMENT;

MECHANICAL IMPEDANCE;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

DAMAGE; PIEZOELECTRICITY; PIEZOMETER; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 0141871974     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.307     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Banan MR, Banan MR, Hjelmstad KD. Parameter estimation of structures from static response I. Computational aspects. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1994; 120:3243-3258.
2. Sanayei M, Saletnik MJ. Parameter estimation of structures from static strain measurements. I: Formulation. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1996; 122:555-562.
3. Pandey AK, Biswas M. Damage detection in structures using changes in flexibility. Journal of Sound and Vibration 1994; 169:3-17.
4. Topole KG, Stubbs N. Non-destructive damage evaluation of a structure from limited modal parameters. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1995; 24:1427-1436.
5. Xia Y, Hao H, Brownjohn JMW, Xia PQ. Damage identification of structures with uncertain frequency and mode shape data. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:1053-1066.
6. Skjaerbaek PS, Nielsen SRK, Kirkegaard PH, Cakmak AS. Damage localization and quantification of earthquake excited RC-frames. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27:903-916.
7. Elkordy MF, Chang KC, Lee GC. A structural damage neural network monitoring system. Microcomputers in Civil Engineering 1994; 9:83-96.
8. Nakamura M, Masri SF, Chassiakos AG, Caughey TK. A method for non-parametric damage detection through the use of neural networks. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27:997-1010.
9. Hung SL, Kao CY. Structural damage detection using the optimal weights of the approximating artificial neural networks. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:217-234.
10. Giurgiutiu V, Redmond J, Roach D, Rackow K. Active sensors for health monitoring of aging aerospace structures. Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Smart Structures and Integrated Systems, New Port Beach, 2000, 3985:294-305.
11. Sun FP, Chaudhry Z, Rogers CA, Majmundar M, Liang C. Automated real-time structure health monitoring via signature pattern recognition. Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Smart Structures and Materials, San Diego, California, 27 February - 1 March 1995, 2443:236-247.
12. Ayres JW, Lalande F, Chaudhry Z, Rogers CA. Qualitative impedance-based health monitoring of civil infrastructures. Smart Materials and Structures 1998; 7:599-605.
13. Bhalla S, Soh CK, Tseng KKH, Naidu ASK. Diagnosis of incipient damage in steel structures by means of piezoceramic patches. Proceedings of the Eighth East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction, Singapore, 5-7 December 2001; p. 238.
14. Soh CK, Tseng KKH, Bhalla S, Gupta A. Performance of smart piezoceramic patches in health monitoring of a RC bridge. Smart Materials and Structures 2000; 9:533-542.
15. Park G, Cudney HH, Inman DJ. Impedance-based health monitoring of civil structural components. Journal of Infrastructure Systems (ASCE) 2000; 6:153-160.
16. Park G, Cudney HH, Inman DJ. Feasibility of using impedance-based damage assessment for pipeline structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30:1463-1474.
17. Halliday D, Resnick R, Walker J. Fundamentals of Physics (6th edn). Wiley: New York, 2001; pp. 768-800.
18. Harris CM. Shock and Vibration Handbook (3rd edn). McGraw-Hill: New York, 1988; 10.1-10.46.
19. Ikeda T. Fundamentals of Piezoelectricity. Oxford University Press: Oxford; 1990.
20. Gandhi MV, Thompson BS. Smart Materials and Structures; Chapman & Hall: London; 1992.
21. Sirohi J, Chopra I. Fundamental understanding of piezoelectric strain sensors. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 2000; 11:246-257.
22. Giurgiutiu V, Zagrai AN, Characterization of piezoelectric wafer active sensors. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 2000; 11:959-976.
23. Kamada T, Fujita T, Hatayama T, Arikabe T, Murai N, Aizawa S, Tohyama K. Active vibration control of frame structures with smart structures using piezoelectric actuators (vibration control by control of bending moments of columns). Smart Materials and Structures 1997; 6:448-456.
24. Liang C, Sun FP, Rogers CA. Coupled electro-mechanical analysis of adaptive material systems: determination of the actuator power consumption and system energy transfer. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 1994; 5:12-20.
25. Giurgiutiu V, Rogers CA. Recent advancements in the electro-mechanical (E/M) impedance method for structural health monitoring and NDE. Proceedings of SPIE Conference on Smart Structures and Integrated Systems, San Diego, California, March 1998, 3329:536 547.
26. Winston HA, Sun F, Annigeri BS. Structural health monitoring with piezoelectric active sensors. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power (ASME) 2001; 123:353-358.
27. Saffi M, Sayyah T. Health monitoring of concrete structures strengthened with advanced composite materials using piezoelectric transducers. Composites Part B: Engineering 2001; 32:333-342.
28. Hewlett Packard. HP LF 4192A Impedance Analyser, Operation Manual. Japan; 1996.
29. Tseng KKH, Naidu ASK. Non-parametric damage detection and characterization using smart piezoceramic material. Smart Materials and Structures 2002; 11:317 329.
30. Bhalla S, Naidu ASK, Soh CK. Influence of structure actuator interactions and temperature on piezoelectric mechatronic signatures for NDE. Proceedings of the ISSS-SPIE Conference on Smart Materials, Structures and Systems, Bangalore, 12-14 December 2002. pp. 213-219.
31. Kreyszig E. Advanced Engineering Mathematics (7th edn). Wiley: New York, 1993.
32. Giurgiutiu V, Zagrai AN. Embedded self-sensing piezoelectric active sensors for on-line structural identification. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics (ASME) 2002; 124:116-125.
33. RS Components, Product Information Catalogue: http://www.rs-components.com, Northants, UK; 2003 (Website last accessed on 20 January 2003).
34. PI Ceramic, Product Information Catalogue: http: www.piceramic.de, Lindenstrasse, Germany; 2003 (Website last accessed on 20 January 2003).
35. Lu Y, Hao H, Ma G, Zhou Y. Simulation of structural response under high-frequency ground excitation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30:307-325.
36. Lu Y, Hao H, Ma GW. Experimental investigation of RC model structures under simulated ground shock excitations and associated analytical studies (Part 2). Technical Report No 5, NTU-DSTA (LEO) Joint R&D Project on Theoretical and Experimental Study of Damage Criteria of RC Structures Subjected to Underground Blast Induced Ground Motions; 2000.
37. Esteban, J. Analysis of the sensing region of a PZT actuator-sensor. Ph.D. Dissertation: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 1996.
38. Zhou S. Liang C, Rogers CA. Integration and design of piezoceramic elements in intelligent structures. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 1995; 6:733-743.
39. Zhou SW, Liang C, Rogers CA. An impedance-based system modelling approach for induced strain actuator-driven structures. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics (ASME) 1996; 118:323-331.