Pressure-specifying sensory device: Quantitative sensory measurement in the oral cavity and oropharynx of normal adults

Ear, Nose and Throat Journal

Volumn 82, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 682-690

  Sinha, Uttam K ^a,d   Rhee, John ^b   Alcaraz, Nelson ^c   Urken, Mark L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^c MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d LAC USC MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEEK MUCOSA; DEVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOUTH CAVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; OROPHARYNX; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRESSURE SENSE; PRESSURE SPECIFYING SENSORY DEVICE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

EID: 0141869996     PISSN: 01455613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/014556130308200910     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Matloub HS, Larson DL, Kuhn JC, et al. Lateral arm free flap in oral cavity reconstruction: A functional evaluation. Head Neck 1989;11:205-11.
2. Urken ML, Buchbinder D, Weinberg H, et al. Functional evaluation following microvascular oromandibular reconstruction of the oral cancer patient: A comparative study of reconstructed and nonreconstructed patients. Laryngoscope 1991;101:935-50.
3. Urken ML. Composite free flaps in oromandibular reconstruction. Review of the literature. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;117:724-32.
4. Baker SR. Microvascular free flaps in soft-tissue augmentation of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;112: 733-7.
5. Irons GB, Wood MB, Schmitt EH III. Experience with one hundred consecutive free flaps. Ann Plast Surg 1987;18:17-23.
6. Shaw WW. Microvascular free flaps. The first decade. Clin Plast Surg 1983;10:3-20.
7. Wall JT, Kaas JH, Sur M, et al. Functional reorganization in somatosensory cortical areas 3b and 1 of adult monkeys after median nerve repair: Possible relationships to sensory recovery in humans. J Neurosci 1986;6:218-33.
8. Boyd B, Mulholland S, Gullane P, et al. Reinnervated lateral antebrachial cutaneous neurosome flaps in oral reconstruction: Are we making sense? Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93:1350-9; discussion 1360-2.
9. Urken ML. The restoration or preservation of sensation in the oral cavity following ablative surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:607-12.
10. Sherrington CS. Cutaneous sensations. In: Schaefer EA, ed. Textbook of Physiology. Vol. 2. London: Young J. Pentland, 1900:934-9.
11. Grossman RC. Methods for evaluating oral surface sensation. J Dent Res 1964;43:301-3.
12. Grossman RC, Hattis BF, Ringel RL. Oral tactile experience. Arch Oral Biol 1965;10:691-705.
13. Ringel RL, Ewanowski SJ. Oral perception: I. Two-point discrimination. In: Bosma JF, ed. Symposium on Oral Sensation and Perception. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas, 1967:389-98.
14. Henkin RE, Banks V. Tactile perception on the tongue palate and the hand of normal man. In: Bosma JF, ed. Symposium on Oral Sensation and Perception. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas, 1967:182-7.
15. Bosma JF. Human infant oral function. In: Bosma JF, ed. Symposium on Oral Sensation and Perception. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas, 1967:98-110.
16. Rutherford D, McCall G. Testing oral sensation and perception in persons with dysarthria. In: Bosma JF, ed. Symposium on Oral Sensation and Perception. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas, 1967:118-201.
17. Lass NJ, Kotchek CL, Deem JF. Oral two-point discrimination: Further evidence of asymmetry on right and left sides of selected oral structures. Percept Mot Skills 1972;35:59-67.
18. Maeyama T, Plattig KH. Minimal two-point discrimination in human tongue and palate. Am J Otolaryngol 1989; 10: 342-4.
19. Aviv JE, Hecht C, Weinberg H, et al. Surface sensibility of the floor of the mouth and tongue in healthy controls and in radiated patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;107:418-23.
20. Lundborg G. Peripheral nerve injuries: Pathophysiology and strategies for treatment. J Hand Ther 1993;6:179-88.
21. Dellon AL. Evaluation of Sensibility and Re-education of Sensation in the Hand. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1981.
22. Brown CJ, Mackinnon SE, Dellon AL, Bain JR. The sensory potential of free flap donor sites. Ann Plast Surg 1989;23:135-40.
23. Dellon ES, Mourey R, Dellon AL. Human pressure perception values for constant and moving one- and two-point discrimination. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;90:112-17.
24. Dellon AL. Evaluation of Sensibility and Re-education of Sensation in the Hand. Baltimore: John D. Lucas, 1988:4-13.
25. Semmes J, Weinstein S, Ghent L, Telber HL. Somatosensory Changes after Penetrating Brain Wounds in Man. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960.
26. Levin S, Pearsall G, Ruderman RJ. Von Frey's method of measuring pressure sensibility in the hand: An engineering analysis of the Weinstein-Semmes pressure aesthesiometer. J Hand Surg 1978;3:211-16.
27. Dellon AL. Evaluation of Sensibility and Re-education of Sensation in the Hand. Baltimore: John D. Lucas, 1988:123-39.
28. Moberg E. Criticism and study of methods for examining sensibility of the hand. Neurology 1962;12:8-9.
29. Flynn JE, Flynn WF. Median and ulnar nerve injuries. Ann Surg 1962;156:1002-9.
30. Merzenich MM, Jenkins WM. Reorganization of cortical representations of the hand following alterations of skin inputs induced by nerve injury, skin island transfers, and experience. J Hand Ther 1993;6:89-104.
31. Vinograd A, Taylor E, Grossman S. Sensory retraining of the hemiplegic hand. Am J Occup Ther 1962;5:246-51.
32. Parry CB, Salter M. Sensory re-education after median nerve lesions. Hand 1976;8:250-7.
33. Dellon AL. Sensory recovery in replanted digits and transplanted toes: A review. J Reconstr Microsurg 1986;2:123-9.
34. Omer GE. Sensory evaluation by the pickup test. In: Jewett DL, McCarroll HR, Jr., eds. Nerve Repair and Regeneration: Its Clinical and Experimental Basis. St. Louis: Mosby, 1980.