Negotiating validity claims in political interviews

Text

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 415-460

  Fetzer, Anita ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141863681     PISSN: 01654888     EISSN: 18607349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/text.1.2000.20.4.415     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Arlt, H. J. and Jarren, O. (1998). Über den Umgang mit einer wählerischcn Klientel: Politik enstteht heute erst durch Medienvermittlung oder: die modernen Regeln der Öffentlichkeitsarbeit. Frankfurter Rundschau 12 January, p. 7
2. Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (eds.) (1984). Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
3. Bell, P. (1977). M Watkins, The Damnation of Demidenk - interview or inquisition? Towards a pragmatic interpretation of genre. Social Semiotics 7: 31-45
4. Bell, A. and Garret, P. (eds.) (1998). Approaches to Media Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell
5. Blum-Kulka, S. (1983). The dynamics of political interviews. Text 3 (2): 131-153
6. Bull, P. (1994). How to identify questions, replies and non-replies in political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13: 115-131
7. - (2000). Equivocation and the rhetoric of modernisation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology (in press)
8. Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
9. Chilton, P. (ed.) (1998). Political Discourse in Transition in Europe 1989-1991. Amsterdam: Benjamins
10. Clayman, S. (1988). Displaying neutrality in television news interviews. Social Problems 35: 474-492
11. - (1992). Footing and achievement of neutrality: The case of news interview discourse. In Talk at Work, P. Drew and J. Heritage (cds.), 163-198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
12. - (1993). Reformulating the question: A device for answering/not answering questions in news interviews and press conferences. Text 13(2): 159-188
13. Ensink, T. (1986). Discourse Analysis and Public Life. Dordrecht: Fortis
14. Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse. London: Arnold
15. Fetzer, Anita (1994). Negative Interaktionen. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang
16. - (1997). Negative contextualization: A socio-semiotic approach to language teaching. In The Cultural Context in Foreign Language Teaching, M. Pütz (ed.), 85-109. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang
17. - (1998). NEIN-SAGEN. In Beiträge zu Sprache und Sprachen, 5. Münchner Linguistik Tage, R. Pittner and K. Pittner (cds.), 183-191. München: Lincom
18. - (1999a). Validity claims: Assigning contextual information. In Information Seeking in Context: Proceedings of the 2nd 1SIC Conference, Sheffield, 1998, T. D. Wilson and D. Allen (eds.), 494-505. London: Taylor
19. - (1999b). Challenging the unspoken: Exploiting the ideology in and of political interviews. In Language and Ideology: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, vol. 1, J. Verschueren (ed.), 98-113. International Pragmatics Association: Antwerp
20. Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News. London: Routledge
21. Fraser, B. (1990). Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 219-236
22. Givón, Talmy (1993). English Grammar; A Function-based Introduction. Amsterdam: Benjamins
23. Goffman, Erving (1970). Strategic Interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press
24. - (1974). Frame Analysis. New York: Harper and Row
25. Greatbatch, D. (1988). A turn-taking system for British news Interviews. Language in Society 17:401-430
26. - (1992). The management of disagreement between news interviewees. In Talk at Work, P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds.), 268-301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
27. - (1998). Conversation analysis: Neutralism in British news interviews. In Approaches to Media Discourse, A. Bell and P. Garret (eds.), 163-185. Oxford: Blackwell
28. Grice, H. P. (1975) Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), 41-58. New York: Academic Press
29. Habermas, J. (1987). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp
30. Halliday, M. A. K. (1996). Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold
31. Harnish, R. (1991). Logical form and implicature. In Pragmatics: A Reader, S. Davis (ed.), 316-364. Oxford: Oxford University Press
32. Harris, S. (1991). Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews. In Broadcast Talk. P. Scannell (cd.), 76-99. London: Routledge
33. Heritage, J. (1985). Analysing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. 3, T. A. van Dijk (ed.), 95-117. London: Academic Press
34. Holly, W. (1990a). Politik als Fernschunterhaltung. Diskussion Deutsch 21: 508-528
35. - (1990b). Politikersprache. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
36. Holmes, J. (1992). Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Longman
37. Jucker, A. (1986). News Interviews: A Pragmalinguistic Analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins
38. Keller, E. (1981). Gambits: Conversational signals. In Conversational Routine, F. Coulmas (ed.), 93-113. The Hague: Mouton
39. Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman
40. Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
41. - (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman's concepts of participation. In Erving Goffman Exploring the Interaction Order, P. Drew and A. Wootton (eds.), 161-227. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
42. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of prefcrred/dispreferrcd turn shapes. In Structures of Social Action, J. Atkinson and J. M. Heritage (eds.), 57-101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
43. Rcucher, T. (ed.) (1987). Grammatik des Sozialen: eine Theorie des gesellschaftlichen Codes und des gesellschaftlichen Diskurses. Tübingen: Narr
44. Scanell, P. (ed.)(1991). Broadcast Talk. London: Routledge
45. Schegloff, E. (1989). From interview to confrontation. Research on Language and Social Action 22: 215-240
46. Scollon, R. (1998). Mediated Discourse as Social Interaction. Longman: London
47. Scarle, J. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In Syntax and Semantics, P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), 59-82. New York: Academic Press
48. Tannen, D. (1981). The machine-gun question. An example of conversational style. Journal of Pragmatics 5: 383-397
49. van Dijk, T. (1981). Studies in the Pragmatics of Discourse. The Hague: Mouton
50. - (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage
51. Wardhaugh, R. (1998). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Blackwell: Oxford
52. Wilson, J. (1990). Politically Speaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press