Effectiveness of geogrids as inclusions in cover soils of slopes of waste disposal areas

Geotextiles and Geomembranes

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 317-337

  Palmeira, Ennio M ^a   Viana, Helber N L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRASILIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cover soils; Geogrid; Geomembranes; Geotextile; Ramp tests; Slopes

Indexed keywords

BEARING CAPACITY; FORMABILITY; GEOTEXTILES; INCLUSIONS; SOILS; STIFFNESS; TENSILE TESTING; WASTE DISPOSAL;

TENSILE FORCES;

GEOMEMBRANES;

CONTAINMENT BARRIER; GEOSYNTHETICS; GEOTEXTILE; SLOPE STABILIZATION; WASTE DISPOSAL;

GEOSYNTHETICS; GEOTEXTILE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; WASTE CONTAINMENT;

EID: 0141855334     PISSN: 02661144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0266-1144(03)00030-X     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Girard, H., Fisher, S., Alonso, E., 1990. Problems of friction posed by the use of geomembranes on dam slopes-examples and measurements. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 9 (2), 129-143.
2. Girard, H., Berroir, G., Gourc, J.P., Matheu, G., 1994. Frictional behaviour of geosynthetic and slope stability of lining systems. Fifth International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products, Vol. 1, Singapore, pp. 339-342.
3. Giroud, J.P., Swan, R.H., Richer, P.J., Spooner, P.R., 1990. Geosynthetic landfill cap: laboratory and field tests, design and construction. Fourth International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products, Vol. 2, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 493-498.
4. Gourc, J.P., Lalarakotoson, S., Mller-Rochholtz, H., Bronstein, Z., 1996. Friction measurements by direct shearing or tilting process-development of a European standard. First European Conference on Geosynthetics-EUROGEO I, Vol. 1, Maastricht, The Netherlands. pp. 1039-1046.
5. Dyer, M.R., 1985. Observation of the stress distribution in crushed glass with applications to soil reinforcement. D.Phil Thesis, University of Oxford, UK.
6. Izgin, M., Wasti, Y., 1998. Geomembrane-sand interface frictional properties as determined by inclined board and shear box tests. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 16 (4), 207-219.
7. Koutsourais, M.M., Sprague, C.J., Pucetas, R.C., 1991. Interfacial friction study of cap and liner components for landfill design. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 10 (5-6), 531-548.
8. Lalarakotoson, S., Villard, P., Gourc, J.P., 1999. Shear strength characterization of geosynthetic interfaces on inclined planes. Geotechnical Testing Journal 22(4) (GTJODJ), 284-291.
9. Lopes, P.C., Lopes, M.L., Lopes, M.P., 2001. Shear behaviour of geosynthetics in the inclined plane test-influence of soil particle size and geosynthetic structure. Geosynthetics International 8(4) (IFAI, USA), 327-342.
10. Palmeira, E.M., Milligan, G.W.E., 1989, Scale and other factors affecting the results of pull-out tests of grids buried in sand. Geotechnique 39 (3), 511-524.
11. Palmeira, E.M., Lima Jr., N.R., Mello, L.G.R., 2002, Interaction between soils and geosynthetic layers in large-scale ramp tests. Geosynthetics International 9(2) (IFAI, USA), 149-187.
12. Viana, H.N., 2003. The effects of geogrids on the behaviour of cover soils of slopes of waste disposal areas. MSc. Dissertation, University of Brasilia, Brazil (in Portuguese).
13. Wasti, Y., Özdüzgün. Z.B., 2001. Geomembrane-geotextile interface shear properties as determined by inclined board and direct shear box tests. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 19 (1), 45-57.