Voice rehabilitation in laryngectomees: Comparison of daily-life performance of 4 types of alaryngeal speech

Journal of the Chinese Medical Association

Volumn 66, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 360-363

  Tsai, Tung Lung ^a   Chang, Shyue Yih ^a   Guo, Yuan Ching ^a   Chu, Pen Yuan ^a  

^a TAIPEI VETERANS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Alaryngeal speech; Laryngectomee; Rehabilitation; Total laryngectomy

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EMOTION; ESOPHAGUS SPEECH; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARYNGECTOMY; LARYNX PROSTHESIS; LOUDNESS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PITCH; PNEUMATIC TOOL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH REHABILITATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TAIWAN; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; METHODOLOGY; VOICE;

FEMALE; HUMANS; LARYNGECTOMY; MALE; SPEECH, ALARYNGEAL; VOICE;

EID: 0141854973     PISSN: 17264901     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Tsai TL, Chu PY, Chang SY. The satisfaction in speech rehabilitation and quality of life following laryngectomy in Taiwan. J Taiwan Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;37:169-75.
2. Clements KS, Rassekh CH, Seikaly H, Hokanson JA, Calhoun KH. Communication after laryngectomy. An assessment of patient satisfaction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 123:493-6.
3. Carr MM, Schmidbauer JA, Majaess L, Smith RL. Communication after laryngectomy: an assessment of quality of life. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;122:39-43.
4. Karnell LH, Funk GF, Tomblin JB, Hoffman HT. Quality of life measurements of speech in the head and neck cancer patient population. Head Neck 1999;21:229-38.
5. Green G, Hults M. Preferences for three types of alaryngeal speech. J Speech Hear Disord 1982;47:141-5.
6. Gates GA, Ryan W, Cooper JC Jr, Lawllis GF, Cantu E, Hayashi T, et al. Current status of laryngectomee rehabilitation: I Results of therapy. Am J Otolaryngol 1982;3:1-7.
7. Gates GA, Ryan W, Cantu E, Hearne E. Current status of laryngectomee rehabilitation: II Causes of Failure. Am J Otolaryngol 1982;3:8-14.
8. Chalstrey SE, Bleach NR, Cheung D, Van Hasselt CA. A pneumatic artificial larynx popularized in Hong Kong. J Laryngol Otol 1994;180:852-4.
9. Yiu EM, van Hasselt CA, Willams SR, Woo JK. Speech intelligibility in tone language (Chinese) larynectomy speakers. Eur J Disord Commun 1994;29:339-47.
10. Ching TY, Williams R, Van Hasselt A. Communication of lexical tones in Cantonese alaryngeal speech. J Speech Hear Res 1994;37:557-71.
11. Williams SE, Watson JB. Differences in speaking proficiencies in three laryngectomee groups. Arch Otolaryngol 1985;111: 216-9.
12. Williams SE, Watson JB. Speaking proficiency variations according to method of alaryngeal voicing. Laryngoscope 1987; 97:737-9.
13. Singer MD, Bloom ED, Hamaker RC. Voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. J Otolaryngol 1983;12:329-34.
14. Tardy-Mitzell S, Andres M, Bowman S. Acceptability and intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech. Arch Otolaryngol 1985;111:213-5.