Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 385-389

  Aimjirakul, Pantira ^a   Masuda, Takayuki ^a   Takahashi, Hidekazu ^a   Miura, Hiroyuki ^a  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGAR; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COPPER DERIVATIVE; ELASTOMER; POLYETHER; POLYSULFIDE; SILICONE; SULFIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACCURACY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DENTAL SURGERY; EVALUATION; GEL; GINGIVA; MICROSCOPY; MODEL; POLYMERIZATION; SIMULATION; VISCOELASTICITY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; ELASTICITY; ELASTOMERS; ETHERS; GINGIVA; HUMANS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; POLYVINYLS; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; SEPHAROSE; SILICONE ELASTOMERS; SILOXANES; SULFIDES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0141851153     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Baharav H, Laufer BZ, Langer Y, Cardash HS. The effect of displacement time on gingival crevice width. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:248-253.
2. Millar B. How to make a good impression (crown and bridge). Br Dent J 2001;191:402-405.
3. McCabe JF, Arikawa H. Rheological properties of elastomeric impression materials before and during setting. J Dent Res 1998;77:1874-1880.
4. Braden M. Viscosity and consistency of impression rubbers. J Dent Res 1967;46:429-433.
5. Cook WD. Rheological studies of the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials. I. Network structure of the set state. J Biomed Mater Res 1982;16:315-330.
6. Hegdahl T, Gjerdet NR. Flowing of light-bodied elastic impression materials. Acta Odontol Scand 1981;39:33-38.
7. Laufer BZ, Baharav H, Cardash HS. The linear accuracy of impressions and stone dies as affected by the thickness of the impression margin. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:247-252.
8. Anusavice KJ. Hydrocolloid impression materials. In: Phillips' Science of Dental Materials. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1996:111-137.
9. Laufer BZ, Baharav H, Ganor Y, Cardash HS. The effect of marginal thickness on the distortion of different impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:466-471.
10. Laufer BZ, Baharav H, Langer Y, Cardash HS. The closure of the gingival crevice following gingival retraction for impression making. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:629-635.
11. Combe EC, Moser JB. The rheological characteristics of elastomeric impression materials. J Dent Res 1978;57:221-226.
12. Takahashi H, Finger WJ. Dentin surface reproduction with hydrophilic and hydrophobic impression materials. Dent Mater 1991;7:197-201.
13. Herfort TW, Gerberich WW, Macosko CW, Goodkind RJ. Viscosity of elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1977;38:396-404.
14. Cook WD. Rheological studies of the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials. II. Viscosity measurements. J Biomed Mater Res 1982;16:331-344.
15. Tolley LG, Craig RG. Viscoelastic properties of elastomeric impression materials: Polysulphide, silicone and polyether rubbers. J Oral Rehabil 1978;5:121-128.
16. Federick DR, Caputo A. Comparing the accuracy of reversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impression materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:183-188.
17. Braden M, Causton B, Clarke RL. A polyether impression rubber. J Dent Res 1972;51:889-896.
18. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Accuracy of alginate and elastomeric impression materials. Scand J Dent Res 1989;97:375-379.
19. Craig RG. Review of dental impression materials. Adv Dent Res 1988;2:51-64.
20. Barghi N, Ontiveros JC. A predictable and accurate technique with elastomeric impression materials. Am J Dent 1999;12:161-163.