The response of doctors and their patients to the introduction of guideline-based therapy for acute low back pain;Haltungen und urteile von ärzten und ihren patienten bei einführung einer leitliniengestützten therapie des akuten rückenschmerzes

Zeitschrift fur Allgemeinmedizin

Volumn 79, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 448-452

  Weismann, Norbert ^a   Brockmann, S ^b   Bous, F ^b   Rusche, H ^b   Abholz, H H ^b  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

General practice; Guideline; Low back pain; Therapy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EDUCATION; EMOTION; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

EID: 0141848607     PISSN: 09376801     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Burgers JS, Grol RPTM, Zaat JOM, Spies TH, van der Bij AK, Mokkink HGA: Characteristics of effective clinical guidelines for general practice. British Journal of General Practice 2003; 53 (1): 15-19
2. Miller JS, Pinnington MA: Straightforward consultation or complicated condition? General practitioners' perception of low back pain. European Journal of General Practice 2003; 9: 3-9
3. Granney M, Warren E, Barton St, Gardner K, Walley T: Why do GPs not implement evidence-based guidelines? A descriptive study. Family Practice 2001; 18: 359-363
4. Freeman AG, Sweeny K: Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study. BJM 2001; 323: 1-5
5. Mayer J, Pitermann L: The attitude of Australian GPs to evidence-based medicine: a focus group study. Familiy Practice 1999; 16: 627-632
6. Becker A, Niebling W, Kochen MM, Chenot JF: Leitlinie »Kreuzschmerzen« der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemeinmedizin und Familienmedizin (DEGAM), Langversion, Unautorisierter Entwurf für den Praxistest, Stand Oktober 2002; Düsseldorf: omikron publishing; 2002