Influence of the radiographer on the pain felt during mammography

European Radiology

Volumn 13, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 2384-2389

  Van Goethem, Mireille ^a   Mortelmans, D ^a   Bruyninckx, E ^a   Verslegers, I ^a   Biltjes, I ^a   Van Hove, E ^a   De Schepper, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Communication; Information; Mammography; Pain; Pain opinion; Radiographers

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; BREAST CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTALGIA; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOLOGIST; RISK ASSESSMENT;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROBABILITY; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAMPLING STUDIES;

EID: 0141841665     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1686-6     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Tabar L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A, Baldetorp L, Holmberg LH, Grontoft O, Ljungquist U, Lundstrom B, Manson JC, Eklund G et al. (1985) Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1:829-832
2. Scheiden R, Sand J, Tanous AM, Capesius C, Wagener C, Wagnon Knolle U, Faverly D (2001) Consequences of a National Screening Program on diagnostic procedures and tumor sizes in breast cancer. A retrospective study of 1540 cases diagnosed and histologically confirmed between 1995 and 1997. Pathol Res Pract 197:467-474
3. Van Dam P, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E, Vervliet J, Van Den Veyver I, De Schepper A, Buytaert P (1988) Palpable solid breast masses: retrospective single- and multimodality evaluation of 201 lesions. Radiology 166:435-439
4. Rojas MP, Telaro E, Russo A, Fossatir R, Confalonieri C, Liberati A (2000) Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD001768
5. Nielsen BB et al. (1991) Pain and discomfort associated with film-screen mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 83:1754-1756
6. Rutter DR, Calnan M, Vaille MS, Field S, Wade KA (1992) Discomfort and pain during mammography: description, prediction and prevention. Br Med J 305:443-445
7. Leaney BJ, Martin M (1992) Breast pain associated with mammographic compression. Australas Radiol 36:120-123
8. Keefe FJ, Hauck ER, Egert J, Rimer B, Kornguth P (1994) Mammography pain and discomfort: a cognitive-behavioral perspective. Pain 56:247-260
9. Dullum JR, Lewis EC, Mayer JA (2000) Rates and correlates of discomfort associated with mammography. Radiology 214:547-552
10. Stomper PC et al. (1988) Is mammography painful? A multicentre patient survey. Arch Intern Med 148:521-524
11. Keemers-Gels ME, Groenendijk RP, van den Heuvel JH, Boetes C, Peer PG, Wobbes TH (2000) Pain experience by women attending breast cancer screening. Breast Cancer Res Treat 60:235-240
12. Andrews FJ (2001) Pain during mammography: implications for breast screening programmes. Australas Radiol 45:113-117
13. Elwood M, McNoe B, Smith T, Bandaranayake M, Doyle TC (1998) Once is enough: why some women do not continue to participate in a breast cancer screening programme. N Z Med J 22 111:180-183
14. Aro AR, Absetz-Ylostalo P, Eerola T, Pamilo M, Lonnqvist J (1996) Pain and discomfort during mammography. Eur J Cancer 32A:1674-1679
15. Scaf-Klomp W, Van Sonderen E, Van Den Heuvel W (1997) Compliance after 17 years of breast cancer screening. Factors associated with reattendance for periodic breast screening. Eur J Public Health: 182-187
16. Scaf-Klomp W (1997) Screening for breast cancer. Attendance and psychological consequences. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, p 142
17. Fallowfield LJ, Rodway A, Baum M (1990) What are the psychological factors influencing attendance, non-attendance and re-attendance at a breast screening centre? J R Soc Med 83:547-551
18. Aro AR, De Koning HJ, Absetz P, Schreck M (1999) Psychological predictors of first attendance for organised mammography screening. J Med Screen 6:82-88
19. Eklund GW, Gardenosa G (1991) Art of positioning needs revival in mammography. Diagn Imaging (San Franc) 13:131-140
20. Eklund GW, Gardenosa G (1992) The art of mammographic positioning. Radiol Clin North Am 30:21-53
21. Bakker DA, Lightfoot NE, Steggles S, Jackson C (1998) The experience and satisfaction of women attending breast cancer screening. Oncol Nurs Forum 25:115-121
22. Loken K, Steine S, Laerum E (1998) Mammography: influence of departmental practice and women's characteristics on patient satisfaction: comparison of six departments in Norway. Qual Health Care 7:136-14
23. Bruyninckx E, Mortelmans D, Van Goethem M, Van Hove E (1999) Risk factors of pain in mammographic screening. Soc Sci Med 49:933-941
24. Sjolin M, Maerker M (1994) Effects of information on and reflection of women's pain experience during mammography. Vard Nord Utveckl Forsk 14:11-15
25. Cawson J, Billson V, Russel I (1993) Mammographic follow-up: a vital component of breast cancer management. Aust N Z J Surg 63:551-553
26. Kornguth PJ, Rimer BK, Conaway MR, Sullivan DC, Catoe KE, Stout AL, Brackett JS (1993) Impact of patient-controlled compression on the mammography experience. Radiology 186:99-102
27. Kashikar-Zuck S, Keefe FJ, Kornguth P, Beaupre P, Holzberg A, Delong D (1997) Pain coping and the pain experience during mammography: a preliminary study. Pain 73:165-172
28. Agresti A (1990) Categorical data analysis. Wiley, New York, p 558
29. Kaufman R (1996) Comparing effects in dichotomous logistic regression: a variety of standardized coefficients. Soc Sci Q 1:90-109