Clinical audit: Obstetric performance after caesarean section

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 503-506

  Raheem, Mohamed ^a,b   Salloum, M ^a  

^a ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; FETUS DISTRESS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL WELFARE; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIMIGRAVIDA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STILLBIRTH; UTERUS RUPTURE; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

CESAREAN SECTION; CESAREAN SECTION, REPEAT; FEMALE; HUMANS; PARITY; PREGNANCY; TRIAL OF LABOR;

EID: 0141839176     PISSN: 01443615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0144361031000153729     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. AL-Mufti R., McCarthy A. and Fisk N.M. (1996) Obstetricians' personal choice and mode of delivery. Lancet, 347, 544.
2. Beckett V. and Regan L. (2001) Vaginal birth after cesarean. The European experience Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 44, 594-603.
3. Benbow A., Semple D. and Maresh M. (1997) Effective Procedures in Maternity Care Suitable for Audit. London, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
4. Expert Maternity Group (1993) Changing Childbirth. London, HMSO.
5. Flamm B.L., Newman L.A., Thomas S.J., Fallon D. and Yoshida M.M. (1990) Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: results of a 5-year multicentre collaborative study. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 76, 750-754.
6. Health Committee Maternity Services (1992) London, HMSO.
7. Hoskins I.A. and Gomez J.L. (1997) Correlation between maximum cervical dilatation at cesarean section and subsequent vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 89, 591-593.
8. Josefson D. (2001) Vaginal delivery at LSCS triples risk of uterine rupture. British Medical Journal, 323, 68.
9. Lau T.K., Wong S.H. and Li C.Y. (1996) A study of patients' acceptance towards vaginal birth after caesarean section. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 36(2), 155-158.
10. MacDonald C., Pinion S.B. and Macleod U.M. (2002) Scottish Female obstetricians' views on elective LSCS and personal choice for delivery. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 22, 586-589.
11. McMahon M.J., Luther E.R., Bowes W.A. and Olshan A.F. (1996) Comparison of trial of labour with an elective second caesarean section. New England Journal of Medicine, 355, 689-695.
12. Patterson-Brown S. (1998) Should a doctor perform a caesarean section on request? Yes, as long as the woman is fully informed. British Medical Journal, 317, 462-463.
13. Rosen M.G. and Dickinson J.C. (1990) Vaginal birth after caesarean: a meta-analysis of indicators for success. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 76, 865-869.
14. Thomas J. and Paranjothy S. (2001) RCOG Clinical effectiveness support unit. National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London, RCOG Press.
15. Turnbull D.A., Wilkinson C., Yaser A., Carty V., Svigos J.M. and Robinson J.S. (1999) Women's role and satisfaction in the decision to have a caesarean section. Medical Journal of Australia, 170, 580-583.