Computational Challenges in Cell Simulation: A Software Engineering Approach

IEEE Intelligent Systems

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 64-71

  Takahashi, Kouichi ^a   Yugi, Katsuyuki ^a   Hashimoto, Kenta ^a   Yamada, Yohei ^a   Tomita, Masaru ^a   Pickett, Christopher J F ^b  

^a KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

C (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); CELLS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING;

BIOSIMULATION; E CELL; GENE ENCODINGS; OBJECT ORIENTED DESIGN;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0141837071     PISSN: 15411672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/MIS.2002.1039834     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. M. Tomita et al., “E-Cell: Software Environment for Whole Cell Simulation,” Bioinformatics, vol. 15, no. 1, Jan. 1999, pp. 72-84.
2. J.J. Tyson, K. Chen, and B. Novak, “Network Dynamics and Cell Physiology,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 2, no. 12, Dec. 2001, pp. 908-916.
3. R.D. Phair and T. Misteli, “Kinetic Modeling Approaches to in vivo Imaging,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 2, no. 12, Dec. 2001, pp. 898-907.
4. E.L. King and C. Altman, “A Schematic Method of Deriving the Rate Laws for Enzyme Catalysed Reactions,” J. Physical Chemistry, vol. 60, 1956, pp. 1375-1378.
5. L. Michaelis and M.L. Menten, “Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung” (Kinetics of the Action of Invertine), Biochemische Zeitschrift, vol. 49, 1913, pp. 333-369 (in German).
6. C.W. Gear, Numerical Initial Value Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations, PrenticeHall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., 1971.
7. D. Bray, R.B. Bourret, and M.I. Simon, “Computer Simulation of the Phosphorylation Cascade Controlling Bacterial Chemotaxis,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 4, no. 5, May 1993, pp. 469-482.
8. C.J. Morton-Firth, T.S. Shimizu, and D. Bray, “A Free-Energy-Based Stochastic Simulation of the Tar Receptor Complex,” J. Molecular Biology, vol. 286, no. 4, Mar. 1999, pp. 1059-1074.
9. H.H. McAdams and L. Shapiro, “Circuit Simulation of Genetic Networks” Science, vol. 269, no. 5,224, Aug. 1995, pp. 650-656.
10. M.A. Savageau, Biochemical Systems Analysis: A Study of Function and Design in Molecular Biology, Addison-Wesley, Boston, 1976.
11. J. Hasty et al., “Computational Studies of Gene Regulatory Networks:In numeroMolecular Biology,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 2, no. 4, Apr. 2001, pp. 268-279.
12. K. Hashimoto et al., “Generic Gene Expression System for Modeling Complex Gene Regulation Network Using E-Cell System,” Genome Informatics 1999, Universal Academy Press, Tokyo, pp. 356-357.
13. C.E. Novitski and A.S. Bajer, “Interaction of Microtubules and the Mechanism of Chromosome Movement (Zipper Hypothesis). 3 Theoretical Analysis of Energy Requirements and Computer Simulation of Chromosome Movement,” Cytobios, vol. 18, 1978, pp. 173-182.
14. F. Gibbons et al., “A Dynamical Model of Kinesin-Microtubule Motility Assays,” Biophysics J., vol. 80, no. 6, June 2001, pp. 2515-2526.
15. M. Hitz and H. Werthner, “Earning Benefits of the Object-Oriented Paradigm in Dynamic System,” Proc. IEEE Hawaii Int'l Conf. System Sciences(HICSS), IEEE Computer Soc. Press, Los Alamitos, Calif.,1997.