The Cochrane oral health group trials register: Electronic searching and beyond

Journal of Dental Education

Volumn 67, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 925-931

  Bickley, Sylvia R ^a   Glenny, Anne Marie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY DENTAL HOSPITAL OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DATA BASE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SERVICE; MEDLINE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGISTER;

CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS; DATABASES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; INFORMATION SERVICES; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MEDLINE; ORAL HEALTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; REGISTRIES;

EID: 0141831063     PISSN: 00220337     EISSN: 19307837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Sjogren P, Halling A. MEDLINE search validity for randomised controlled trials in different areas of dental research. Br Dent J 2002;192(2):97-9.
2. Russo SP, Fiorellini JP, Weber HP, Niederman R. Benchmarking the dental implant evidence on MEDLINE. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15(6):792-800.
3. Nishimura K, Rasool F, Ferguson MB, Sobel M, Niederman R. Benchmarking the clinical prosthetic dental literature on MEDLINE. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88(5):533-41.
4. Niederman R, Chen L, Murzyn L, Conway S. Benchmarking the dental randomised controlled literature on MEDLINE. Evidence-Based Dentistry 2002;3(1):5-9.
5. Sun RL, Conway S, Zawaideh S, Niederman DR. Benchmarking the clinical orthodontic evidence on MEDLINE. Angle Orthod 2000;70(6):464-70.
6. Kim MY, Lin J, White R, Niederman R. Benchmarking the endodontic literature on MEDLINE. J Endod 2001;27(7):470-3.
7. Egger M, Smith GD. Bias in location and selection of studies. BMJ 1998;316(7124):61-6.
8. Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994;309 (6964):1286-91.
9. Suarez-Almazor M, Belseck E, Homik J, Dorgan M, Ramos-Remus C. Identifying clinical trials in the medical literature with electronic databases: MEDLINE alone is not enough. Control Clin Trials 2000;21:476-87.
10. Bickley S, Harrison J. How to...find the evidence. J Orthod 2003;30:72-8.
11. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Clin Oral Investig 2003;7(1):2-7.
12. Hopewell S, McDonald S. Full publication of trials initially reported as abstracts in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 1980-2000. Intern Med J 2003;33(4):192-4.
13. Stolk P, Egberts AC, Leufkens HG. Fate of abstracts presented at five International Conferences on Pharmacoepidemiology (ICPE), 1995-1999. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2002;11(2):105-11.
14. Larian B, Namazie A, Agha N, Azizzadeh B, Blackwell K, Wang MB. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the American academy of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;125(3):166-9.
15. Byerly WG, Rheney CC, Connelly JF, Verzino KC. Publication rates of abstracts from two pharmacy meetings. Ann Pharmacother 2000;34(10):1123-7.
16. Jackson KR, Daluiski A, Kay RM. Publication of abstracts submitted to the annual meeting of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. J Pediatr Orthop 2000;20(1):2-6.
17. Payne C. Publication of abstracts presented at diabetes meetings. Diabetes Care 1999;22(2):362.
18. Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA 1990;263(10):1385-9.
19. Egger M, Zellweger-Zahner T, Schneider M, Junker C, Lengeler C, Antes G. Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German. Lancet 1997;350:158-62.
20. Türp J, Schulte J, Antes G. Nearly half of dental randomized controlled trials published in German are not included in MEDLINE. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110:405-11.