Analyzing the cost of screening selectee and non-selectee baggage

Risk Analysis

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 897-908

  Virta, Julie L ^a   Jacobson, Sheldon H ^a   Kobza, John E ^b  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

^b Texas Tech University   (United States)

Author keywords

Aviation security; Cost benefit; Economic analysis; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

BAGGAGE HANDLING; COST ACCOUNTING; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

BAGGAGE SCREENING DEVICES;

SECURITY SYSTEMS;

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS;

AIRPORT; ARTICLE; AVIATION SECURITY; BAGGAGE; CONTAINER; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEVICE; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ORGANIZATION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 0141816735     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1539-6924.00367     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Dessent, G. (1987). Prison perimeter cost-effectiveness. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 38, 975-980.
2. Lazarick, R. (1998). Airport vulnerability assessment - An analytical approach. International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology, 40-46.
3. Mead, K. M. (2001a). Deployment and Use of Security Technologies. Report Number CC-2002-007, Office of Inspector General, Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
4. Mead, K. M. (2001b). Status of Airline Security After September 11, 2001. Report Number CC-2002-038, Office of Inspector General, Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
5. Rao, E., & Dickey, R. (1999). Evaluation of the FAA's security equipment integration program. International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology, 158-167.
6. Tarr, C. (1995). Cost effective perimeter security. European Convention on Security and Detection (pp. 183-187). Brighton, England.