A local-time algorithm for achieving quantum control

Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Volumn 107, Issue 37, 2003, Pages 7264-7268

  Yip, Frank L ^a   Mazziotti, David A ^a   Rabitz, Herschel ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISCRETIZED MEMBERS; LOCAL TIME ALGORITHM; OPTIMAL CONTROL THEORY;

ALGORITHMS; ELECTRIC FIELD EFFECTS; HAMILTONIANS; ITERATIVE METHODS; OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY CONTROL; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0141793968     PISSN: 10895639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp030313r     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Rabitz, H.; de Vivie-Riedle, R.; Motzkus, M.; Kompa, K. Science 2000, 288, 824.
2. Rice, S. A.; Zhao, M. Quantum Control of Molecular Dynamics; Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2000.
3. Shi, S.; Rabitz, H. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92, 364.
4. Rabitz, H.; Zhu, W. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 572.
5. Kosloff, R.; Rice, S. A.; Gaspard, P.; Tersigni, S.; Tannor, D. Chem. Phys. 1989, 139, 201.
6. Pierce, A. P.; Dahleh, M. A.; Rabitz, H. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 37, 4950.
7. de Vivie-Riedle, R.; Sundermann, K.; Motzkus, M. Faraday Discuss. 1999, 113, 303.
8. Geremia, J. M.; Zhu, W.; Rabitz, H. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 10848.
9. Zhu, W.; Rabitz, H. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 109, 385.
10. Hoki, K.; Fujimura, Y. Chem. Phys. 2001, 267, 187.
11. Sundermann, K.; de Vivie-Riedle, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 1896.
12. Kaluža, M.; Muckerman, J. T.; Gross, P.; Rabitz, H. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 4211.
13. Manz, J.; Sundermann, K.; de Vivie-Riedle, R. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 209, 415.
14. Judson, R. S.; Rabitz, H. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 68, 1500.
15. N. Došlić, Kühn, O.; Manz, J.; Sundermann, K. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 9645.
16. Zhang, H.; Rabitz, H. Phys. Rev. A 1994, 49, 2241.
17. Zhu, W.; Rabitz, H. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 10187.
18. Ohtsuki, Y.; Yahata, Y.; Kono, H.; Fujimura, Y. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 287, 627.
19. Tannor, D. J.; Kosloff, R.; Bartana, A. Faraday Discuss. 1999, 113, 365.
20. Sugawara, M.; Fujimura, Y. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 5646.
21. Ohtsuki, Y.; Kono, H.; Fujimura, Y. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 9318.
22. Watanabe, Y.; Umeda, H.; Ohtsuki, Y.; Kono, H.; Fujimura, Y. Chem. Phys. 1997, 217, 317.
23. De Nicolao, G.; Magni, L.; Scattolini, R. Lect. Notes Contr. Inf. 1999, 245, 408.
24. Mayne, D. Q.; Rawlings, J. B.; Rao, C. V.; Scokaert, P. O. M. Automatica 2000, 36, 789.
25. Mayne, D. Q.; Schroeder, W. R. Automatica 1997, 33, 2103.
26. Yip, F.; Mazziotti, D.; Rabitz, H. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 8168.
27. Lu, Z. M.; Rabitz, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 9, 13731.
28. Chen, Y.; Gross, P.; Ramakrishna, V.; Rabitz, H.; Mease, K. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 102, 8001.
29. Nguyen-Dang, T. T.; Chatelas, C.; Tanguay, D. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 102, 1528.
30. Magni, L.; De Nicolao, G.; Scattolini, R. Automatica 2001, 37, 1601.
31. 14 = 0.00.
32. Low-pass postfiltering was accomplised by fast Fourier transforming (FFT) the electric field signal, setting all frequencies above a cutoff value equal to zero, and finally inverse fast Fourier transforming the data back into the time domain. Details of postfilter implementation can be found in: Mitra, S. K. Digital Signal Processing: A Computer Based Approach; McGraw-Hill: New York, 2000.
33. 31 The eigenvalues for levels |5> through |8> were 8.42, 9.00, 9.48, and 9.78, respectively. Nonzero coupling elements of μ were 0.15 between adjacent levels, 0.08 for next-nearest-neighbor transitions, and 0.01 for transitions through two intermediate states.