Multiway Frequency Analysis for Experimental Psychologists

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 257-264

  Vokey, John R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LETHBRIDGE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141791183     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0087429     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2. Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., & Holland, P. W. (1975). Discrete multivariate analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Blyth, C. R. (1972). On Simpson's paradox and the sure thing principle. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67, 364-381.
4. Camilli, G. (1990). The test of homogeneity for 2 × 2 contingency tables: A review of and some personal opinions on the controversy. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 135-145.
5. Cohen, J. (1982). Set correlation as a general data-analytic method. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17, 301-341.
6. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Cowles, M. (1989). Statistics in psychology: An historical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Deming, W. E., & Stephan, F. F. (1940). On a least squares adjustment of a sampled frequency table when the expected marginal totals are known. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11, 427-444.
9. Eysenk, H. J. (1975). Who needs a random sample? Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 28, 195-198.
10. 2 from contingency tables and the calculation of p. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 85, 87-94.
11. 2 measures the discrepancy between observed observation and hypothesis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 87, 442-450.
12. Fisher, R. A. (1935). Statistical methods for research workers (5th ed.). Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd.
13. Gilbert, N. (1993). Analyzing tabular data: Loglinear and logistic models for social researchers. London: UCL Press Limited.
14. Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., & Tversky, A. (1985). The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 295-314.
15. Goodman, L. A. (1971). The analysis of multidimensional contingency tables: Stepwise procedures and direct estimation methods for building models for multiple classifications. Technometrics, 13, 33-61.
16. Haberman, S. H. (1978). Analysis of qualitative data, Volume 1: Introductory topics. New York: Academic Press.
17. Haberman, S. H. (1979). Analysis of qualitative data, Volume 2: New developments. New York: Academic Press.
18. Haberman, S. J. (1972). Algorithm AS 51: Log-linear fit for contingency tables. Applied Statistics, 21, 218-225.
19. Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. O. (1993). Assumptions for statistical inference. The American Statistician, 47, 1-11.
20. Hintzman, D. L. (1980). Simpson's paradox and the analysis of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 87, 398-410.
21. Kennedy, J. J. (1983). Analyzing qualitative data: Introductory log-linear analysis for behavioral research. New York: Praeger.
22. Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38, 379-397.
23. Olzak, L. A., & Wickens, T. D. (1983). The interpretation of detection data through direct multivariate frequency analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 574-585.
24. Pearson, K. (1900). On a criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can reasonably be supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Philosophical Magazine, 50, 157-175.
25. Pearson, K. (1904). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. XIII. On the theory of contingency and its relation to asociation and normal correlation. Draper's Company Research Memoirs, Biometric Series 1, 1-35.
26. Pearson, K. (1911). On the probability that two independent distributions of frequency are really samples from the same population. Biometrica, 8, 250-254.
27. Pearson, K. (1916). On a brief proof of the fundamental formula for testing the goodness of fit of frequency distributions and of the probable error of "p". Philosophical Magazine, 31, 369-378.
28. Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York' CBS College Publishing.
29. Rouanet, H., Bernard, J., & Lecoutre, B. (1986). Nonprobabilistic statistical inference: A set-theoretic approach. The American Statistican, 40, 60-65.
30. Simpson, E. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. The American Statistician, 13, 238-241.
31. Tversky, A., & Gilovich, T. (1989), The cold facts about the "hot hand" in basketball. CHANCE: New directions for statistics and computing, 2, 16-21.
32. Vokey, J. R. (1997). Collapsing multiway contingency tables: Simpson's paradox and homogenization. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 29, 210-215.
33. Vokey, J. R. (1998). Statistics without probability: Significance testing as typicality and exchangeability in data analysis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 225-226.
34. Wardrop, R. L. (1995). Simpson's paradox and the hot hand in basketball. The American Statistician, 49, 24-29ss.
35. Wickens, T. D. (1989). Multiway contingency tables analysis for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Wickens, T. D. (1993). Analysis of contingency tables with between-subjects variability. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 191-204.
37. 2 lest. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B., 1, 217-235.