Constructing empirical bioethics: Foucauldian reflections on the empirical turn in bioethics research

Health Care Analysis

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 3-13

  Ashcroft, Richard E ^a,b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b Reynolds Building ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Empirical bioethics; Foucault; Modernity; Public participation; Social research

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; FOUCAULDIAN REFLECTION; HISTORY OF MEDICINE; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PHILOSOPHY; POLITICS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SOCIOLOGY;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

BIOETHICS; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ETHICAL THEORY; HUMANS; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

EID: 0141786966     PISSN: 10653058     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025329811812     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Adorno, T.W. (1973) The Jargon of Authenticity. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
2. Adorno, T.W. (2000) Problems of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
3. Akrich, M. and Latour, B. (1992) A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies. In W.E. Bijker and J. Law (Eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society (pp. 259-264). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
4. Althusser, L. (1996) For Marx. London: Verso.
5. Ashcroft, R.E. (1995) The Genealogy of Scientific Ethics. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, unpublished PhD thesis.
6. Ashcroft, R.E. (1999) Teaching for Patient Centred Ethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3, 287-295.
7. Baker, K.M. (1975) Condorcet: From Natural Philosophy to Social Mathematics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Bauer, M.W. and Gaskell, G. (eds.) (2002) Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society. London: SAGE.
10. Bennett, R. and Cribb, A. (2001) The Relevance of Empirical Research to Bioethics: Reviewing the Debate. Manchester: EMPIRE project working paper.
11. Bernstein, J.M. (2001) Adorno. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L.J.D. (1996) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Brooks, D. (2001) BoBos in Paradise. New York: Simon and Schuster.
14. Deleuze, G. (1988) Foucault. London: Athlone Press.
15. Derrida, J. (1981) Writing and Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Durkheim, E. (2001) The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Foucault, M. (1974) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
18. Foucault, M. (1979) The History of Sexuality. London: Penguin.
19. Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge. London: Routledge.
20. Foucault, M. (2000) Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, volume 3. London: Penguin.
21. Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
22. Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L., Beatty, J. and Krüger, L. (1989) The Empire of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Golinski, J. (1998) Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Hacking, I. (1990) The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Haimes, E. (2002) What Can the Social Sciences Contribute to the Study of Ethics? Theoretical, Empirical and Substantive Considerations. Bioethics 16, 89-113.
26. Hoffmaster, B. (1992) Can Ethnography Save the Life of Medical Ethics? Social Science and Medicine 35, 1421-1431.
27. Holm, S. (1997) Ethical Problems in Clinical Practice. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
28. Hope, T. (1999) Empirical Medical Ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 25, 219-220.
29. Kleinman, A. M., Fox, R.C. and Brandt, A.M. (1999) Bioethics and Beyond Daedalus 128, no. 4 (special issue).
30. Kusch, M. (Ed.) (2000) The Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge. The Hague: Kluwer Academic.
31. Larmore, C. (1996) The Morals of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action. Milton Keynes; Open University Press.
33. Lyotard, J.-F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
34. Lyotard J.-F. (1988) The Differend Manchester: Manchester University Press.
35. Mulkay, M.J. (1985) The Word and the World. London: HarperCollins,
36. O'Neill O. (2002) Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Pippin, R.B. (1999) Modernity as a Philosophical Problem. Oxford: Blackwell.
38. Porter, T. (1996) Trust in Numbers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39. Priest, S. (1987) Hegel's Critique of Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Rabinow, P. (1996) Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41. Reuzel, R.P.B. (2001) Health Technology Assessment and Interactive Evaluation: Different Perspectives. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen, unpublished PhD dissertation.
42. Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Searle, J. (1964) How to Derive 'Ought' From 'Is'. Philosophical Review 73, 43-58.
44. Spallone, P. and Wilkie, T. (2000) The Research Agenda in Pharmacogenetics and Biological Samples Collections - A View From the Wellcome Trust. New Genetics and Society 19, 193-205.
45. Touraine, A. (1984) Solidarity: The Analysis of a Social Movement, 1980-1981. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Woolgar, S. (Ed.) (1988) Knowledge and Reflexivity. London: SAGE.
47. York, P. and Jennings, C. (1996) Peter York's The Eighties. London: BBC Books.
48. Zussman, R. (2000) The Contributions of Sociology to Medical Ethics. Hastings Center Report 30, no.1: 7-11.