Effect of rotational speed on root canal preparation with hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 29, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 447-449

  Karagoz Kucukay, Isil ^a   Ersev, Handan ^a   Engin Akkoca, Ece ^a   Küçükay, Sedat ^a   Gürsoy, Tankut ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INSTRUMENT; MANDIBLE; MOLAR TOOTH; ROTATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; HISTOLOGY; INSTRUMENTATION; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH PULP;

DENTAL ALLOY; NICKEL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NICKELIDE;

DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; HUMANS; MOLAR; NICKEL; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; ROTATION; TITANIUM;

EID: 0141782428     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200307000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Glosson CR, Haller RH, Dove SB, Del Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparation using NiTi hand, NiTi engine driven and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endodon 1995;21:146-51.
2. Short JA, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques. J Endodon 1997;23:503-7.
3. Schäfer E, Fritzenschaft B. Vergleichende Untersuchung zweier permanent rotierender Wurzelkanalauf bereitungs-systems auf Nickel-Titan-Basis. Endodontie 1999;8:213-26.
4. Kum K, Spängberg L, Cha BY, Il-Young J, Seung-Jong L, Chan-Young L. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endodon 2000;26:719-23.
5. Bertrand MF, Lupi-Pégurier L, Médioni M, Bolla M. Curved molar root canal preparations using Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Int Endod J 2001;34:631-6.
6. Schneider SS. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32:271-5.
7. Hülsmann M, Schade M, Schäfers F. A comparative study of root canal preparation with HERO 642 and Quantec SC rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J 2001;34:538-46.
8. Thompson SA, Dummer PMH. Shaping ability of Pro-File .04 Taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: 2. Int Endod J 1997;30:8-15.
9. Thompson SA, Dummer PMH. Shaping ability of HERO 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: 2. Int Endod J 2000;33: 255-61.
10. Thompson SA, Dummer PMH. Shaping ability of HERO 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: 1. Int Endod J 2000;33: 248-54.
11. Thompson SA, Dummer PMH. Shaping ability of Pro-File .04 Taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: 1. Int Endod J 1997;30:1-7.
12. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endodon 1997;23:77-85.
13. Gabel WP, Hoen M, Steiman HR, Pink FE, Dietz R. Effect of rotational speed on nickel-titanium file distortion. J Endodon 1999;25:752-4.
14. Daugherty DW, Gound TG, Comer TL. Comparison of fracture rate, deformation rate, and efficiency between rotary endodontic instruments driven at 150 rpm and 350 rpm. J Endodon 2001;27:93-5.
15. Poulsen WB, Dove SB, Del Rio CE. Effect of nickel-titanium engine-driven instrument rotational speed on root canal morphology. J Endodon 1995;21:609-12.
16. Dietz DB, Di Fiore PM, Bahcall JK, Lautenschlager EP. Effect of rotational speed on the breakage of nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endodon 2000;26:68-71.