The effects of selective ibotenate lesions of the hippocampus on conditioned inhibition and extinction

Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 111-119

  Chan, K H ^a   Jarrard, L E ^b   Davidson, T L ^c  

^a HARTWICK COLLEGE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IBOTENIC ACID; AMINO ACID RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; HIPPOCAMPUS; HISTOLOGY; MALE; NONHUMAN; RABBIT; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; ANIMAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONDITIONED REFLEX; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

ANIMALS; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; EXCITATORY AMINO ACID AGONISTS; EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HIPPOCAMPUS; IBOTENIC ACID; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY;

EID: 0141780932     PISSN: 15307026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/CABN.3.2.111     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. BARNET, R. C., & MILLER R. R. (1996). Temporal encoding as a determinant of inhibitory control. Learning & Motivation, 27, 73-91.
2. BENOIT, S. C., DAVIDSON, T. L., CHAN, K.-H., TRIGILIO, T., & JARRARD, L. E. (1999). Pavlovian conditioning and extinction of context cues and punctate CSs in rats with ibotenate lesions of the hippocampus. Psychobiology, 27, 26-39.
3. BOUTON, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80-99.
4. BOUTON, M. E. (1994). Conditioning, remembering, and forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 219-231.
5. BOUTON M. E., & NELSON, J. B. (1998). Mechanisms of feature-positive and feature-negative discrimination learning in an appetitive conditioning paradigm. In N. A. Schmajuk & P. C. Holland (Eds.), Occasion setting: Associative learning and cognition in animals (pp. 69-112). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6. CHAN, K.-H., MORELL, J. R., JARRARD, L. E., & DAVIDSON, T. L. (2001). Reconsideration of the role of the hippocampus in learned inhibition. Behavioural Brain Research, 119, 111-130.
7. DELAMATER, A. R. (1996). Effects of several extinction treatments upon the integrity of Pavlovian stimulus-outcome associations. Animal Learning & Behavior, 24, 437-449.
8. HIRSH, R. (1974). The hipppocampus and contextual retrieval of information from memory: A theory. Behavioral Biology, 12, 421-444.
9. HOLLAND, P. C. (1985). The nature of CI in serial and simultaneous feature negative discriminations. In R. R. Miller & N.E. Spear (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition (pp. 267-297). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. HOLLAND, P. C. (1989). Occasion setting with simultaneous compounds in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 183-193.
11. HOLLAND, P. C. (1992). Occasion setting in Pavlovian conditioning. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 28, pp. 69-125). San Diego: Academic Press.
12. HOLLAND, P. C., LAMOUREUX, J. A., HAN, J.-S., & GALLAGHER, M. (1999). Hippocampal lesions interfere with Pavlovian negative occasion setting. Hippocampus, 9, 143-157.
13. JARRARD, L. E. (1989). On the use of ibotenate acid to lesion selectively different components of the hippocampal formation. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 29, 251-259.
14. KONORSKI, J. (1948). The physiological bases of memory. Mysl Wspolczesnosc, 5, 214-232.
15. KONORSKI, J. (1967). Integrative activity of the brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. MATZEL, L. D., OLADSTEIN, L., & MILLER, R. R. (1988). Conditioned excitation and conditioned inhibition are not mutually exclusive. Learning & Motivation, 19, 99-121.
17. McINTOSH, A. R., & GONZALEZ-LIMA, F. (1995). Functional network interactions between parallel auditory pathways during Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Brain Research, 683, 228-241.
18. NAIR, H. P., & GONZALEZ-LIMA, F. (1999). Extinction of behavior in infant rats: Development of functional coupling between septal, hippocampal, and ventral tegmental regions. Journal of Neuroscience. 19, 8646-8655.
19. PAXINOS, G., & WATSON, C. (1998). The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. San Diego: Academic Press.
20. PEARCE, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61-73.
21. RESCORLA, R. A. (1969). Conditioned inhibition of fear resulting from negative CS-US contingencies. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 67, 504-509.
22. SOLOMON, P. R. (1977). Role of the hippocampus in blocking and conditioned inhibition of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 91, 407-417.
23. SWARTZENTRUBER, D., & RESCORLA, R. A. (1994). Modulation of trained and extinguished stimuli by facilitators and inhibitors. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 309-316.
24. WAGNER, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. WILLIAMS, D. A., & OVERMIER, J. B. (1988). Some types of conditioned inhibitors carry collateral excitatory associations. Learning & Motivation, 19, 345-368.
26. WILLIAMS, D. A., OVERMIER, J. B., & LOLORDO, V. M. (1992). A reevaluation of Rescorla's early dictums about Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 275-290.