Clinal differentiation and putative hybridization in a contact zone of Pinus ponderosa and P. arizonica (Pinaceae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 88, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 1052-1057

  Epperson, Bryan K ^a   Telewski, Frank W ^a   Plovanich Jones, Anne E ^a   Grimes, Jill E ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinal differentiation; Contact zone; Hybridization; Pinaceae; Pinus arizonica; Pinus ponderosa

Indexed keywords

ANISOTREMUS TAENIATUS; PINACEAE; PINUS ARIZONICA; PINUS PONDEROSA; PINUS PONDEROSA VAR. SCOPULORUM;

EID: 0141777836     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2657087     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. CLIFF, A. D., AND J. K. ORD. 1981. Spatial processes. Pion, London, UK.
2. CONKLE, M. T., AND W. B. CRITCHFIELD. 1988. Genetic variation and hybridization in ponderosa pine. In D. M. Baumgartner and J. E. Lotan [eds.]. Ponderosa pine: the species and its management, 27-43. Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.
3. CRAWFORD, T. J. 1984. The estimation of neighborhood parameters for plant populations. Heredity 52: 273-283.
4. EPPERSON, B. K. 1990. Spatial autocorrelation of genotypes under directional selection. Genetics 124: 757-771.
5. _. 1992. Spatial structure of genetic variation within populations of forest trees. New Forests 6: 257-278.
6. _. 1993. Recent advances in correlation studies of spatial patterns of genetic variation. Evolutionary Biology 27: 95-155.
7. _. 1995. Spatial structure of two-locus genotypes under isolation by distance. Genetics 140: 365-375.
8. _, AND R. W. ALLARD. 1989. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of the distribution of genotypes within populations of lodgepole pine. Genetics 121: 369-377.
9. _, Z. HUANG, AND T.-Q. LI. 1999. Spatial genetic structure of multiallelic loci. Genetical Research Cambridge 73: 251-261.
10. _, AND T.-Q. LI. 1997. Gene dispersal and spatial genetic structure. Evolution 51: 672-681.
11. GOVINDARAJU, D. R. 1988. Life histories, neighbourhood sizes, and variance structure in some North American conifers. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 35: 69-78.
12. KEARNEY, T. H., AND R. H. PEEBLES. 1960. Arizona flora. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
13. PELOQUIN, R. L. 1984. The identification of three-species hybrids in the ponderosa pine complex. Southwestern Naturalist 29: 115-122.
14. REHFELDT, G. E. 1999. Systematics and genetic structure of Ponderosae taxa (Pinaceae) inhabiting the mountain islands of the southwest. American Journal of Botany 86: 741-752.
15. _, B. C. WILSON, S. P. WELLS, AND R. M. JEFFERS. 1996. Phytogeographic, taxonomic, and genetic implications of phenotypic variation in the Ponderosae of the southwest. Southwestern Naturalist 41: 409-418.
16. ROGERS, A. R., AND H. C. HARPENDING. 1983. Population structure and quantitative characters. Genetics 105: 985-1002.
17. SAKAI, A. K., AND N. L. ODEN. 1983. Spatial pattern of sex expression in silver maple (Acer saccharium L.): Morista's index and spatial autocorrelation. American Naturalist 122: 489-508.
18. SAS. 1982. SAS user's guide: statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
19. SOKAL, R. R., G. M. JACQUEZ, AND M. C. WOOTEN. 1989. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of migration and selection. Genetics 121: 845-855.
20. _, AND N. L. ODEN. 1978. Spatial autocorrelation in biology. 1. Methodology. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 10: 199-228.
21. _, AND D. E. WARTENBERG. 1983. A test of spatial autocorrelation analysis using an isolation-by-distance model. Genetics 105: 219-237.
22. VAN DEVENDER, T. R. 1990. Late quaternary vegetation and climate of the Sonoran desert, United States and Mexico. In J. L. Betancourt, T. R. Van Devender, and P. S. Martin [eds.], Packrat middens: the last 40,000 years of biotic change, 134-165. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
23. WRIGHT, J. W. 1976. Introduction to forest genetics. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
24. WRIGHT, S. 1943. Isolation by distance. Genetics 28: 114-138.