Potential applications of mussel modelling

Helgoland Marine Research

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 76-85

  Beadman, H A ^a   Willows, R I ^b   Kaiser, M J ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b National Centre for Risk Analysis and Options Appraisal   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cultivation; Dynamic energy budget; Models; Mussel

Indexed keywords

BIVALVE; COMMERCIAL SPECIES; CULTIVATION; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0141772994     PISSN: 1438387X     EISSN: 14383888     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10152-001-0092-9     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ameyaw-Akumfi C, Hughes RN (1987) Behaviour of Carcinus maenas feeding on large Mytilus edulis: how do they assess the optimal diet? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 38:213-216
2. Asmus H, Asmus RM (1993) Phytoplankton-mussel bed interactions in intertidal ecosystems. In: Dame RF (ed) Bivalve filter feeders in estuarine and coastal processes. (NATO ASI series, vol G33) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 57-84
3. Bayne BL, Hawkins AJS, Navarro E (1987) Feeding and digestion by the mussel Mytilus edulis L. (Bivalvia, Mollusca) in mixtures of silt and algal cells at low concentrations. J Exp Mar Ecol 111:1-22
4. Bayne BL, Hawkins AJS, Navarro E (1988) Feeding and digestion in suspension feeding bivalve molluscs: the relevance of physiological compensations. Am Zool 28:147-159
5. Beck MB (1987) Water quality modeling: a review of the analysis of uncertainty. Water Resour Res 23:1393-1442
6. Begon M, Firbank L, Wall R (1986) Is there a self-thinning rule for animal populations? Oikos 46:122-124
7. Butman CA, Fréchette M, Geyer WR, Starczak VR (1994) Flume experiments on food supply to the blue mussel Mytilus edulis L. as a function of boundary-layer flow. Limnol Oceanogr 39:1755-1768
8. Campbell DE, Newell CR (1998) MUSMOD, a production model for bottom culture of the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis, L. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 219:171-203
9. Cayford J, Goss-Custard JD (1990) Seasonal changes in the size selection of mussels, Mytilus edulis, by oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus: an optimality approach. Anim Behav 40:609-642
10. Cloerne JE (1982) Does the benthos control phytoplankton in South San Francisco Bay? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 9:191-202
11. Cohen RRH, Dresler PV, Phillips EPJ, Cory RL (1984) The effect of the Asiatic clam, Corbicula fluminea, on phytoplankton on the Potomac River, Maryland. Limnol Oceanogr 29:170-180
12. Dame RF (1993) The role of bivalve filter feeder material fluxes in estuarine ecosystems. In: Dame RF (ed) Bivalve filter feeders in estuarine and coastal processes. (NATO ASI series, vol G33) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 245-270
13. Dare PJ, Edwards DB (1976) Experiments on the survival, growth and yield of relaid seed mussels (Mytilus edulis L.) in the Menai Straits, North Wales. J Cons Int Explor Mer 37:16-28
14. Dolmer P (1998) The interactions between bed structure of Mytilus edulis L. and the predator Asterias rubens L. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 2281:137-150
15. Dowd M (1997) On predicting the growth of cultured bivalves. Ecol Model 104: 113-131
16. Dunthorn AA (1971) The predation of cultivated mussels by eiders. Bird Stud 18:107-112
17. Elliott JM (1993) The self-thinning rule applied to juvenile seatrout, Salmo trutta. J Anim Ecol 62:371-379
18. Elner RW, Campbell A (1987) Natural diets of lobster Homarus americanus from barren ground and macroalgal habitats off southwest Nova Scotia, Canada. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 37:131-140
19. Fréchette M, Bourget E (1985a) Energy flow between the pelagic and benthic zones: factors controlling particulate organic matter available to an intertidal mussel bed. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 42:1158-1165
20. Fréchette M, Bourget E (1985b) Food limited growth of Mytilus edulis L. in relation to the benthic boundary layer. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 42:1166-1170
21. Fréchette M, Grant J (1991) An in situ estimation of the effect of wind-driven resuspension on the growth of the mussel Mytilus edulis L. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 148:201-213
22. Fréchette M, Lefaivre D (1990) Discriminating between food and space limitation in benthic suspension feeders using self-thinning relationships. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 65:15-23
23. Fréchette M, Butman CA, Geyer WR (1989) The importance of boundary layer flows in supply phytoplankton to the benthic suspension feeder Mytilus edulis L. Limnol Oceanogr 34:19-36
24. Frécette M, Aitken AE, Page L (1992) Interdependence of food and space limitation of a benthic suspension feeder: consequences for self-thinning relationships. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 83:55-62
25. Gosling EM (1992) Systematics and geographic distribution of Mytilus. In: Gosling E (ed) The mussel Mytilus: ecology, physiology, genetics and culture. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1-17
26. Goss-Custard JD, Willows RI (1996) Modelling the responses of mussel Mytilus edulis and oystercatcher Haematapus ostralegus populations to environmental change. In: Greenstreet SPR, Tasker ML (eds) Aquatic predators and their prey. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 73-85
27. Goss-Custard JD, Caldow RWG, Clarke RT, West AD (1995) Deriving population parameters from individual variations in foraging behaviour. I. Empirical game theory distribution model of oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus feeding on mussels Mytilus edulis. J Anim Ecol 64:265-276
28. Grant J, Bacher C (1998) Comparative models of mussel bioenergetics and their validation at field culture sites. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 2191-2: 21-44
29. Grant J, Dowd M, Thompson CE, Hatcher A (1993) Perspectives on field studies and related biological models of bivalve growth and carrying capacity. In: Dame RF (ed) Bivalve filter feeders in estuarine and coastal processes. (NATO ASI series, vol G33) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 371-420
30. Guillemette M, Ydenberg RC, Himmelman JH (1992) The role of energy intake in prey and habitat selection of common eiders Somateria mollisima in winter: a risk-sensitive interpretation. J Anim Ecol 61:559-610
31. Guinez D, Castilla JC (1999) A tridimensional model for mutilayered intertidal mussels. Am Nat 54:341-375
32. Haren RJF van, Kooijman SALM (1993) Application of a dynamic energy budget model to Mytilus edulis. Neth J Sea Res 31: 119-133
33. Hawkins AJS, Bayne BL (1985) Seasonal variation in the relative utilization of carbon and nitrogen by the mussel Mytilus edulis: budgets, conversion efficiencies and maintenance requirements. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 25:181-188
34. Hawkins AJS, Smith RFM, Bayne BL, Heral M (1996) Novel observations underlying the fast growth of suspension-feeding shellfish in turbid environments: Mytilus edulis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 131:179-190
35. Hawkins AJS, Bayne BL, Bougrier S, Heral M Inglesias JIP, Navarro E, Smith RFM, Urrutia MB (1998) Some general relationships in comparing the feeding physiology of suspension-feeding bivalve molluscs. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 219:87-103
36. Herman PMJ (1993) A set of models to investigate the role of benthic suspension feeders in estuarine ecosystems. In: Dame RF (ed) Bivalve filter feeders in estuarine and coastal processes. (NATO ASI series, vol G33) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 421-454
37. Hickman RW (1992) Mussel cultivation. In: Gosling E (ed) The mussel Mytilus: ecology, physiology, genetics and culture. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 465-510
38. Hilgerloh G, Siemoneit H (1999) A simple mathematical model upon the effect of predation by birds on the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) population. Ecol Model 124:175-182
39. Hughes RN, Griffiths CL (1988) Self-thinning in barnacles and mussels: the geometry of packing. Am Nat 132:484-491
40. Jubb CA, Hughes RN, Ap Rheinallt T (1983) Behavioural mechanisms of size-selection by crabs, Carcinus maenas (L.) feeding on mussels, Mytilus edulis L. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 66:81-87
41. Kooijman SALM (1986) Population dynamics on the basis of budgets. In: Metz JAJ, Diekmann O (eds) The dynamics of physiologically structured populations. (Lecture motes in biomathematics, vol 68) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 266-297
42. Manahan DT, Wright SH, Stephens GC, Rice MA (1982) Transport of dissolved amino acids by the mussel, Mytilus edulis: demonstration of net uptake from natural seawater. Science 215:1253-1255
43. Meire PM, Ervynck A (1986) Are oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus) selecting the most profitable mussels (Mytilus edulis)? Anim Behav 34:1427-1435
44. Navarro E, Iglesias JIP (1993) Infaunal filter-feeding bivalves and the physiological response to short-term fluctuations in food availability and composition. In: Dame RF (ed) Bivalve filter feeders in estuarine and coastal processes. (NATO ASI series, vol G33) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 25-56
45. Newell CR, Gallagher SM (1992) Short-term variability in seston flux and physiological responses of bottom cultured mussels (Mytilus edulis) in Maine. J Shellfish Res 11:203
46. Norberg J, Tedengren M (1995) Attack behaviour and predatory success of Asterias rubens L. related to differences in size and morphology of the prey mussel Mytilus edulis L. J Exp Biol Ecol 186:207-220
47. Okamura B (1986) Group living and the effects of spatial position in aggregations of Mytilus edulis. Oecologia 69:341-347
48. O'Neill SM, Sutterlin AM, Aggett D (1983) The effect of size-selected feeding by starfish (Asterias vulgaris) on the production of mussels (Mytilus edulis) cultured on nets. Aquaculture 35: 211-220
49. Paine RT (1976) Size-limited predation: an observational and experimental approach with the Mytilus-Pisaster interaction. Ecology 57:858-873
50. Ragnarsson SA, Raffaelli D (1999) Effect of the mussel Mytilus edulis on the invertebrate fauna of sediments. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 241:31-43
51. Rubles C (1987) Predator foraging characteristics and prey population structure on a sheltered shore. Ecology 66:1502-1514
52. Ross AH, Nisbet RM (1990) Dynamic models of growth and reproduction of the mussel Mytilus edulis. Funct Ecol 4:777-787
53. Roughgarden J, Gaines S, Possingham H (1988) Recruitment dynamics in complex lifecycles. Science 241:1460-1466
54. Scholten H, Smaal AC (1998) Responses of Mytilus edulis L. to varying food concentrations: testing EMMY, an ecophysiological model. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 219:217-239
55. Scholten H, Smaal AC (1999) The ecophysiological response of mussels (Mytilus edulis) in mesocosms to a range of inorganic nutrient loads: simulations with the model EMMY. Aquat Ecol 33:83-100
56. Seed R (1969) The ecology of Mytilus edulis L. (Lamellibranchiata) on exposed rocky shores. II. Growth and mortality. Oecologia 3:317-350
57. Seed R (1976) Ecology of marine mussels. In: Bayne BL (ed) Marine mussels: their ecology and physiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 13-65
58. Seed R (1993) Invertebrate predators and their role in structuring coastal and estuarine populations of filter feeding bivalves. In: Dame RF (ed) Bivalve filter feeders in estuarine and coastal processes. (NATO ASI series, vol G33) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 149-195
59. Seed R, Suchanek TH (1992) Population and community ecology of Mytilus. In: Gosling E (ed) The mussel Mytilus: ecology, physiology, genetics and culture. Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp 87-157
60. Smaal AC (1991) The ecology and cultivation of mussels: new advances. Aquaculture 94:245-261
61. Tsuchiya M, Nishihira M (1985) Islands of Mytilus as habitat for small intertidal animals: effect of island size on community structure. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 25:71-81
62. Tsuchiya M, Nishihira M (1986) Islands of Mytilus as habitat for small intertidal animals; effects of Mytilus age structure on the species composition of the associated fauna and community organisation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 31:171-178
63. Weller DE (1987) Self-thinning exponent correlated with allometric measures of plant geometry. Ecology 68:813-821
64. Westoby M (1984) The self-thinning rule. Adv Ecol Res 14: 167-225
65. White J (1980) Demographic factors in populations of plants. In: Solbrig OT (ed) Demography and evolution in plant populations. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif, pp 21-48
66. Willows RI (1992) Optimal digestive investment: a model for filter feeders experiencing variable diets. Limnol Oceanogr 37: 829-847
67. Yoda K, Kira T, Ogawa H, Hozumi K (1963) Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions. J Inst Polytech Osaka City Univ Ser D 14:107-129