Regulating disagreement, constituting participants: A critique of proceduralist theories of democracy

Argumentation

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 139-160

  Hicks, Darrin ^a   Langsdorf, Lenore ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

^b SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141769718     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007773607213     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aune, J. A.: 1994, Rhetoric and Marxism, Westview, Boulder CO.
2. Benhabib, S.: 1996, 'Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy', in S. Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 67-94.
3. Bernstein, R. J.: 1996, 'The Revival of the Democratic Ethos', Cardozo Law Review 17, 1127-1145.
4. Blaug, R.: 1996, 'New Theories of Discursive Democracy: A User's Guide', Philosophy and Social Criticism 22, 49-80.
5. Broda-Bahm, K. T.: 1995, 'Meta-procedure: The Bases for Challenging Operative Norms of Argument', in S. Jackson (ed.), Argument and Values: Proceedings of the Ninth AFA/SCA Conference on Argumentation, Speech Communication Association, Annandale VA, pp. 314-320.
6. Castoriadis, C.: 1997, 'Democracy as Procedure and Democracy as Regime', Constellations 4, 1-18.
7. Cohen, J.: 1996, 'Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy', in S. Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 95-119.
8. Dryzek, J.: 1990, Discursive Democracy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. Eemeren, F. H. van: 1995, 'A World of Difference: The Rich State of Argumentation Theory', Informal Logic 17, 144-158.
10. Eemeren, F. H. van, R. Grootendorst, S. Jackson and S. Jacobs: 1993, Reconstucting Argumentative Discourse, Alabama University Press, Tuscaloosa.
11. Giroux, H.: 1994, Disturbing Pleasures: Learning Popular Culture, Routledge, New York.
12. Greene, R. W.: 1997, Tropes travel: The rhetorical perspective on argumentation and the question of effectivity. Paper presented at the Tenth NCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (Alta, Utah).
13. Gutmann, A. and D. Thompson: 1996, Democracy and Disagreement, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
14. Habermas, J.: 1994, 'Three Normative Models of Democracy', Constellations 1, 1-10.
15. Habermas, J.: 1996a, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (W. Rehg, Trans.), MIT Press, Boston.
16. Habermas, J.: 1996b, 'Reply', Cardozo Law Review 17, 1477-1573.
17. Hicks, D.: 1995, 'Disagereement and Democratic Pluralism', in S. Jackson (ed.), Argument and Values: Proceedings of the Ninth AFA/SCA Conference on Argumentation, Speech Communication Association, Annandale VA, pp. 302-307.
18. Hunt, A.: 1993, Explorations in Law and Society: Towards a Constitutive Theory of Law, Routledge, New York.
19. Hunt, A. and G. Wickham: 1994, Foucault and Law: Towards a Sociology of Law as Governance, Pluto, London.
20. Langsdorf, L.: 1995, 'Argument as Inquiry in a Postmodern Context', in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds.), Perspectives and Approaches, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 452-463.
21. Maier, R.: 1995, 'Argumentation and Identity', in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds.), Perspectives and Approaches, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 260-270.
22. Rawls, J.: 1993, Political Liberalism, Columbia University Press, New York.
23. Reed, R. R.: 1990, 'Are Robert's Rules of Order Counterrevolutionary? Rhetoric and the Reconstruction of Portuguese Politics', Anthropological Quarterly 63, 134-144.
24. Rorty, R.: 1988, Contingency, Irony, Solidarity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
25. Rosenfeld, M.: 1994, 'Law as Discourse: Bridging the Gap between Democracy and Rights', Harvard Law Review 108, 1146-1189.
26. Sandel, M.: 1984, 'The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self', Political Theory 12, 81-96.
27. Sanders, L.: 1997, 'Against Deliberation', Political Theory 25, 347-376.
28. Soltan, K. E. and S. Elkin: 1996, The Constitution of Good Societies, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.
29. Toulmin, S. E.: 1958, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
30. Wenzel, J.: 1990, 'Three Perspectives on Argument', in R. Trapp and J. Schuetz (eds.), Perspectives on Argumentation: Essays in Honor of Wayne Brockriede, Waveland, Prospect Heights IL, pp. 9-26.
31. Wood, R. V.: 1997, Voice as a Preemptive Force in Environmental Decision Making, Unpublished manuscript.
32. Young, I. M.: 1996, 'Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy', in S. Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 120-136.