The effect of constrained processing on auditors' judgments

Accounting, Organizations and Society

Volumn 28, Issue 7-8, 2003, Pages 699-714

  Hoffman, Vicky B ^a   Joe, Jennifer R ^b   Moser, Donald V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141760348     PISSN: 03613682     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00068-5     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Abdolmohammadi M. Wright A. An examination of experience and task complexity on audit judgments The Accounting Review 62 January 1987 1-13
2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement on auditing standards No. 59: the auditor's consideration of an entity's ability to continue as a going concern 1988 AICPA New York
3. Anderson M. A comparative analysis of information search and evaluation behavior of professional and non-professional financial analysts Accounting, Organizations and Society 13 1988 431-446
4. Anderson B.H. Malletta M. Auditor attendance to negative and positive information: the effects of experience-related differences Behavioral Research in Accounting 6 1994 1-20
5. Asare S.K. The auditor's going concern decision: interaction of task variables and the sequential processing of evidence The Accounting Review 67 April 1992 379-393
6. Bargh J. Automatic and conscious processing of social information In Wyer R. Srull T. (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition, Vol. 3 1984 Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ
7. Bédard J. Chi M.T.H. Expertise in auditing Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 12 Suppl. 1993 1-20
8. Biggs S. Selfridge M. Krupka G. A computational model of auditor knowledge and reasoning process in the going concern judgment Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 12 Suppl. 1993 82-99
9. Bonner S.E. Experimental effects in auditing: the role of task-specific knowledge The Accounting Review 65 January 1990 72-92
10. Bonner S.E. Lewis B. Determinants of auditor expertise Journal of Accounting Research 26 Suppl. 1990 1-20
11. Bouwman M.J. The use of accounting information: Expert versus novice behavior In Ungson G.R. Braunstein D.N. (Eds.), Decision making: an interdisciplinary inquiry 1982 Kent Boston, MA
12. Bouwman M.J. Expert versus novice decision making in accounting: a summary Accounting, Organizations and Society 9 June 1984 325-327
13. Bouwman M.J. Frishkoff P.A. Frishkoff P. How do financial analysts make decisions? A process model of the investment screening decision Accounting, Organizations and Society 12 January 1987 1-29
14. Buckless F.R. Ravenscroft S.P. Contrast coding: a refinement of ANOVA in behavioral analysis The Accounting Review 65 October 1990 933-945
15. Choo F. Trotman K.T. The relationship between knowledge structure and judgments for experienced and inexperienced auditors The Accounting Review 66 July 1991 464-485
16. Cuccia A.D. McGill G.A. The role of decision strategies in understanding professionals' susceptibility to judgment biases Journal of Accounting Research 38 Autumn 2000 419-435
17. Fazio R. How do attitudes guide behavior? In Sorrentino R. Higgins E. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: foundations of social behavior 1986 The Guilford Press New York, NY
18. Fazio R. Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: the mode model as an integrative framework In Zanna M. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology Vol. 23 1990 Academic Press San Diego, CA
19. Fiske S.T. Kinder D.R. Larter W.M. The novice and the expert: knowledge-based strategies in political cognition Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 19 July 1983 381-400
20. Frederick D.M. Libby R. Expertise and auditors' judgments of conjunctive events Journal of Accounting Research 24 Autumn 1986 270-290
21. Frederick D.M. Heiman-Hoffman V.B. Libby R. The structure of auditors' knowledge of financial statement errors Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 13 Spring 1994 1-21
22. Gibbins M. Swieringa R.J. Twenty years of judgment research in accounting and auditing In Ashton R.H. Ashton A.H. (Eds.), Judgment and decision-making research in accounting and auditing 1995 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, NY
23. Greenwald A. Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change In Greenwald A. Brock T. Ostrom T. (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes 1968 Academic Press New York
24. Hastie R. Pennington N. Notes on the distinction between memory-based vs. on-line judgments In Bassili J.N. (Ed.), On-line cognition in person perception 1989 Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ
25. Hodge, F., Kennedy, J., & Maines, L. (2002). Recognition versus disclosure in financial statements: does XBRL improve transparency? Working paper, University of Washington.
26. Kaplan S.E. Reckers P.M.J. An examination of information search during initial audit planning Accounting, Organizations, and Society 14 1989 539-550
27. Kennedy J. Debiasing audit judgment with accountability: a framework and experimental results Journal of Accounting Research 31 Autumn 1993 231-245
28. Kida T. The impact of hypothesis-testing strategies on auditor's use of judgmental data Journal of Accounting Research 22 Spring 1984 332-340
29. Krull G. Reckers P.M.J. Wong-on-Wing B. The effect of experience, fraudulent signals and information presentation order on auditors' beliefs Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 12 Fall 1993 143-154
30. Langer E. Rethinking the role of thought in social interaction In Harvey J. Ickes W. Kidd R. (Eds.), New directions in attribution research Vol. 2 1978 Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ
31. Larkin J.H. McDermott J. Simon D.P. Simon H.A. Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems Science 1980 1335-1342
32. Libby R. The role of knowledge and memory in audit judgment In Ashton R.H. Ashton A.H. (Eds.), Judgment and decision-making research in accounting and auditing 1995 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, NY
33. Libby R. Luft J. Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment Accounting, Organizations and Society 18 July 1993 425-450
34. Libby R. Trotman K.T. The review process as a control for differential recall of evidence in auditor judgments Accounting, Organizations and Society 9 June 1993 559-574
35. Lingle J. Ostrom T. Retrieval selectivity in memory-based impression judgments Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 1979 180-194
36. Marchant G. Discussion of determinants of auditor expertise Journal of Accounting Research 26 Suppl. 1990 21-28
37. Mautz R.K. Sharaf H.A. The philosophy of auditing 1961 AAA Sarasota, FL
38. Moser D. Does memory affect judgment? Self-generated versus recall memory measures Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62 1992 555-563
39. Myles-Worsley M. Johnston W.A. Simmons M.A. The influence of expertise on X-ray image processing Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1988 553-557
40. Patel V.L. Evans D.A. Groen G.L. Biomedical knowledge and clinical reasoning In Evans D. Patel V. (Eds.), Cognitive science in medicine: biomedical modelling 1989 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
41. Phillips F. Auditor attention to and judgments of aggressive financial reporting Journal of Accounting Research Spring 1999 167-189
42. Rau S.E. Moser D.V. Does performing other tasks affect going concern judgments? The Accounting Review October 1999 493-508
43. Ricchiute D.N. The effect of audit seniors' decisions on working paper documentation and on partners' decisions Accounting Organizations and Society 24 February 1992 155-171
44. Ricchiute D.N. Working-paper order effects and auditors' going-concern decisions The Accounting Review 67 January 1999 46-58
45. Schneider W. Shiffrin R. Controlled and automatic human information processing: detection, research, and attention Psychological Review 84 1977 1-66
46. Shelton S.E. The effect of experience on the use of irrelevant evidence in auditor judgment The Accounting Review April 1999 217-224
47. Smith J.F. Kida T. Heuristics and biases: expertise and task realism in auditing Psychological Bulletin 109 1991 472-489
48. Swieringa R.J. Weick K.E. An assessment of laboratory experiments in accounting Journal of Accounting Research 20 Suppl. 1982 56-101
49. Tan H. Effects of expectations, prior involvement, and review awareness on memory for audit evidence and judgment Journal of Accounting Research 33 Spring 1995 113-135
50. Taylor S.E. Crocker J. Schematic bases of social information processing In Higgins E.T. et al. (Eds.) Social cognition, the Ontario symposium 1981 Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ
51. Thibodeau, J. (2001). The development and transferability of task knowledge. Working paper, Bentley College.
52. Trotman K.T. Sng J. The effect of hypothesis framing, prior expectations and cue diagnosticity on auditor's information choices Accounting, Organizations and Society 14 December 1989 565-576
53. Trotman K.T. Wright A. Recency effects: task complexity, decision mode, and task-specific experience Behavioral Research in Accounting 8 1996 175-193
54. Trotman K.T. Wright A. Order effects and recency: where do we go from here? Accounting and Finance 40 2000 169-182
55. Tubbs R.M. The effect of experience on auditor's organization and amount of knowledge The Accounting Review 67 October 1992 783-801
56. Waller W.S. Felix W.L.Jr. The auditor and learning from experience: Some conjectures Accounting, Organizations and Society 9 June 1984 383-408
57. Yates F.J. Judgment and decision making 1990 Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ