Unit roots and deterministic trends in spatial econometric models

International Regional Science Review

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 289-312

  Mur, Jesús ^a   Trívez, F Javier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Integration; Spatial autoregressive process; Spatial econometric modeling; Spurious correlation; Spurious regression; Unit roots

Indexed keywords

ECONOMETRICS; MODELING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0141749318     PISSN: 01600176     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0160017603253790     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Anselin, L. 1988. Lagrange multiplier tests diagnostics for spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity. Geographical Analysis 20: 1-17.
2. Anselin, L. 1994. Testing for spatial dependence in linear regression models: A review, Regional Research Institute Paper 94-16. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press.
3. Anselin, L., A. K. Bera, R. J. G. M. Florax, and M. J. Yoon. 1996. Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics 26: 77-104.
4. Anselin, L., and R. J. G. M. Florax. 1995. Small sample properties of tests for spatial dependence in regression models. In New directions in spatial econometrics, edited by L. Anselin and R. J. G. M. Florax, 21-74. Berlin: Springer.
5. Bera, A. K., and M. J. Yoon. 1993. Specification testing with locally misspecified alternatives. Econometric Theory 9: 649-58.
6. Chatterjee, S., and A. S. Hadi. 1988. Sensitivity analysis in linear regression. New York: John Wiley.
7. Fingleton, B. 1999. Spurious spatial regression: Some Monte Carlo results with a spatial unit root and spatial cointegration. Journal of Regional Science 39: 1-19.
8. Florax, R. J. G. M., and T. de Graaff. Forthcoming. The performance of diagnostics tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models: A meta-analysis of simulation studies. In Advances in spatial econometrics: Methodology, tools and applications, edited by L. Anselin, R. J. G. M. Florax, and S. J. Rey, Berlin: Springer.
9. Granger, C. W. J., and P. Newbold. 1974: Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics 2: 111-20.
10. Griffith, D. 1992. Simplifying the normalizing factor in spatial autoregressions for irregular lattices. Papers in Regional Science 71: 71-86.
11. Kelejian, H., and D. Robinson. 1995. Spatial correlation: A suggested alternative to autoregressive models. In New directions in spatial econometrics, edited by L. Anselin and R. J. G. M. Florax, 75-95. Berlin: Springer.
12. Maddala, G. S., and I. M. Kim. 1998. Unit roots, cointegration and structural change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Nelson, C. R., and C. I. Plosser. 1982. Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series: Some evidence and implications. Journal of Monetary Economics 10: 139-62.
14. Ripley, B. D. 1981. Spatial statistics. New York: John Wiley.
15. Tiefelsdorf, M. 2000. Modelling spatial processes: The identification and analysis of spatial relationships in regression residuals by means of Moran's I. Berlin: Springer.
16. Yule, G. U. 1926. Why do we sometimes get nonsense correlations between time series? A study in sampling and the nature of time series. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 89: 1-64.