Government sponsored agencies: Do the benefits outweigh the costs?

Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics

Volumn 25, Issue 2-3, 2002, Pages 121-127

  Sanders, Anthony B ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141737481     PISSN: 08955638     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1016589223768     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Ambrose, B. W., and A. Warga. (1996). "Implications of Privatization: The Costs to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac." In Studies on Privatizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
2. Ambrose, B. W., and A. Warga. (2002). "Measuring Potential GSE Funding Advantages," Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics.
3. Congressional Budget Office. (1996). Assessing the Public Costs and Benefits of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
4. Cook, D. O. (1996). "Review of the Ambrose-Warga and Cotterman-Pearce Papers," in Studies on Privatizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (May).
5. Cotterman, R. F., and J. E. Pearce. (1996). "The Effects of the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation on Conventional Fixed-Rate Mortgage Yields," in Studies on Privatizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
6. McKenzie, J. (2002). "A Reconsideration of the Jumbo/Non-Jumbo Mortgage Rate Differential," Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics.
7. Miller, J. C., R. D. Tollison, and R. S. Higgins. (1996). A Critical Review of the Ambrose and Warga Privatization Study, Freddie Mac.
8. Naranjo, A., and A. Toevs. (2002). "The Effects of Purchases of Mortgages and Securitization by Government Sponsored Enterprises on Mortgage Yield Spreads and Volatility," Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics.
9. Nothaft, F., J. Pearce, and Stevan Stevanovic. (2002). "Debt Spreads Between GSEs and Other Corporations," Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics.
10. Painter, G., and C. Redfearn. (2002). "The Role of Interest Rates in Influencnig Long-run Homeownership Rates," Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics.
11. Passmore, W., R. Sparks, and J. Ingpen. (2002). "GSEs, Mortgage Rates, and the Long-run Effects of Mortgage Securitization," Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics.
12. Pearce, J. E., and J. C. Miller. (2001). Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae Their Funding Advantage and Benefits to Homeownership.
13. Shilling, J. D. (1996). "Comments on the Ambrose-Warga and Cotterman-Pearce Papers," in Studies on Privatizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
14. Toevs, A. L. "A Critique of the CBO's Sponsorship Benefit Analysis." First Manhattan Consulting Group.
15. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (1996). Privatization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Desirability and Feasibility.
16. U.S. Department of the Treasury. (1996). Government Sponsorship of the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Association. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
17. U.S. General a] Accounting Office. (1996). Housing Enterprises: Potential Impacts of Severing Government Sponsorship. Washington DC U.S. Government Printing Office.
18. Van Order, R. (2000). "A Microeconomic Analysis of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac," Regulation 23(2), 27-33.
19. Van Order, R. (2000). "The Structure of the Mortgage Market in the United States: A Model of Dueling Charters," Paper presented at the Midyear Meeting of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, May 30.