Cognitive style in the context of design and technology project work

Educational Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 183-194

  Atkinson, Stephanie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUNDERLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141721959     PISSN: 01443410     EISSN: 14695820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0144341980180204     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. APU. 1981. Understanding Design and Technology, London: HMSO.
2. APU. 1987. Design and Technological Activity: a framework for assessment, London: HMSO.
3. APU. 1994. “ Learning through design and technology ”. In Teaching Technology, Edited by: Banks, F., 59–67. London: Routledge.
4. Atkinson, E.S., 1993. “ Identification of some causes of de-motivation amongst pupils in Year 10 and 11 studying technology with special reference to design and technology ”. In IDATER93, Edited by: Smith, J.S., 17–25. Loughborough: Design and Technology, Loughborough University.
5. Atkinson, E.S., 1994. “ Key factors which affect pupils performance in technology project work ”. In IDATER 94, Edited by: Smith, J.S., 30–37. Loughborough: Design and Technology, Loughborough University.
6. Atkinson, E.S., 1995. “ Approaches to designing at Key Stage 4 ”. In 2nd National Conference on Product Design Education, Edited by: Evatt, M., and Jones, A., Coventry: School of Engineering, Coventry University.
7. Atkinson, E.S., 1996. “ Key factors influencing the quality of pupil performance when engaged in technology project work ”. In JISTEC'96, Edited by: Mioduser, D., and Zilberstein, I., S339Tel Aviv: Gad Nachmias, Centre for Educational Technology.
8. Atkinson, J.W., and Feather, N.T., 1966. A Theory of Achievement Motivation, New York: Wiley.
9. Barlex, D., 1994. “ Modelling in science and design and technology ”. In Teaching Technology, Edited by: Banks, F., 74–81. London and New York: Routledge.
10. Biggs, J.B., and Moore, P.J., 1993. The Process of Learning, 3rd Edn, Australia: Prentice Hall.
11. Brophy, J.E., 1986. On Motivating Students, Occasional Paper No. 101 Michigan: Michigan State University. Institute for Research in Teaching.
12. Chidgey, J., 1994. “ A critique of the design process ”. In Teaching Technology, Edited by: Banks, F., 89–93. London: Routledge.
13. Craik, F.I.M., and Lockhart, R.S., 1972. Levels of processing: a framework for memory research,. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11: 671–684.
14. Cross, N., 1986. “ Towards an understanding of the intrinsic values of design education ”. In Technology in Schools, Edited by: Cross, A., and McCormick, B., 104–121. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
15. Curry, L., 1983. An organisation of learning styles theory and constructs ERIC Document 235 185.
16. Design Council. 1987. Design Education Forum Seminar, London: The Design Council. ’Designing: a framework for discussion’
17. Down, B.K., 1986. “ Problem-solving, CDT and child-centredness ”. In Technology in Schools, Edited by: Cross, A., and McCormick, B., 228–239. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
18. Education Authorities Directory and Annual 1992, London: The School Government Publishing Company Ltd.
19. Eggleston, J., and Schools Council, eds. 1975. Education through Design and Craft, London: Edward Arnold.
20. Entwistle, N.J., and Ramsden, P., 1983. Understanding Student Learning, Kent: Croom Helm.
21. Entwistle, N.J., and Wilson, J.D., 1977. Degrees of Excellence: the academic achievement game, London: Hodder & Stoughton.
22. Fisher, R., 1990. Teaching Children to Think, Oxford: Blackwell.
23. Garner, S.W., 1994. “ The importance of graphic modelling ”. In Teaching Technology, Edited by: Banks, F., 68–73. London: Routledge.
24. Glegg, G.L., 1986. “ The design of the designer ”. In 1986 Product Design and Technological Innovation, Edited by: Roy, R., and Wield, D., 86–91. Milton Keynes: Open University.
25. Harahan, J., 1978. Design in General Education, London: Design Council.
26. Kimbell, R.A., 1994. “ Assessment of design and technology ”. In Teaching Technology, Edited by: Banks, F., 161–172. London: Routledge.
27. Licht, B.G., and Dweck, C.S., 1983. “ Sex differences in academic orientation: consequences for academic choices and attainments ”. In Sex Differentiation and Schooling, Edited by: Marland, M., 72–97. London: Heinemann.
28. Liddament, T., 1993. “ Using models in design and technology education: some conceptual and pedagogic issues ”. In IDATER 93, Edited by: Smith, J.S., 92–96. Loughborough: Design and Technology, Loughborough University.
29. Marton, F., and Saljo, R., 1976. On qualitative differences in learning -- I: outcome and process,. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46: 4–11.
30. Messick, S., 1984. The nature of cognitive styles: problems and promise in educational practice,. Educational Psychologist, 19: 59–74.
31. Morris, T., and Thomas, P., 1995. “ Approaches to applied sport psychology ”. In Sport Psychology: theory, applications and issues, Edited by: Morris, T., and Summers, J., 215–252. Chichester: Wiley.
32. National Curriculum: Design and Technology Working Group. 1988. National Curriculum, Design and Technology Working Group, Interim Report, London: HMSO.
33. Northern Examinations and Assessment Board (NEAB). 1993. General Certificate of Secondary Education: design and technology syllabus for 1995, Newcastle: NEAB.
34. Pye, D., 1978. The Nature and Aesthetics of Design, London: The Herbert Press.
35. Riding, R.J., 1991. Cognitive Styles Analysis, Birmingham: Learning and Training Technology, Assessment Research Unit, Birmingham University.
36. Riding, R.J., 1993. A Trainer's Guide to Learning Design, Sheffield: Learning Method Branch, Department of Employment. Learning Methods Project Report -- OL201
37. Riding, R.J., and Cheema, I., 1991. Cognitive styles: an overview and integration,. Educational Psychology, 11: 193–215.
38. Riding, R.J., and Pearson, F., 1994. The relationship between cognitive style and intelligence,. Educational Psychology, 14: 413–425.
39. Robson, C., 1993. Real World Research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers, Oxford: Blackwell.
40. Roy, R., and Wield, D., 1986. Product Design and Technological Innovation, Milton Keynes: Open University.
41. SEAC/EMU. 1991. The Assessment of Performance in Design and Technology -- the Final Report of the APU Design & Technology Project 1985-91, London: School Examinations & Assessment Council/Evaluation & Monitoring Unit.
42. Schools Curriculum & Assessment Authority (SCAA). 1996. GCSE Results Analysis: an analysis of the 1995 results and trends over time, London: SCAA.
43. Seligman, M.E., 1975. Helplessness, San Francisco: Freeman.
44. Tennent, M., 1988. Psychology and Adult Learning, New York: Wiley.
45. Thomas, P.R., and Bain, J.D., 1984. Contextual dependence of learning approaches: the effects of assessments,. Human Learning, 3: 227–240.
46. Weiner, B., 1992. Human Motivation, Metaphors, Theories, and Research, London: Sage.
47. White, R.T., 1988. Learning Science, New York: Blackwell.