Experimental comparison of cavity sealing ability of five dental adhesive systems after thermocycling

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 139-144

  Cao, Liem ^a   Geerts, Sabine ^a   Gueders, Audrey ^a   Albert, Adelin ^a   Seidel, Laurence ^a   Charpentier, Joseph ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASCORBIC ACID; FISSURE SEALANT; RESIN; SILVER NITRATE;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; HYBRID; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; TEMPERATURE;

BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICON DIOXIDE; SILVER STAINING; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0141717272     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Arcoria CJ, Vitasek BA, Dewald JP, Wagner MJ. Microleakage in restorations with glass-ionomer liners after thermocycling. J Dent 1990:18;107-112.
2. Barnes DM, Thompson VP, Blank LW, Mc Donald NJ. Microleakage of class V composite resin restorations: a comparison between in vivo and in vitro. Oper Dent 1993;18:237-245.
3. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:567-577.
4. Belli S., Inokoshi S, Ozer F, Pereira PN, Ogata M, Tagami J. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations. Oper Dent 2000;26:70-75.
5. Bertolotti RL, Laamanen H. Bite-formed posterior resin composite restorations, placed with a self etching primer and a novel matrix. Quintessence Int 1999;30:419-422.
6. Birkenfeld LH, Schulman A. Enhanced retention of glass-ionomer sealant by enamel etching: a microleakage and scanning electron microscopic study. Quintessence Int 1999;30:712-718.
7. Brown WS, Jacobs HR, Thompson RE. Thermal fatigue in teeth. J Dent Res 1972;51:461-467.
8. Chan KC. Microleakage between glass-ionomer cement and composite resins. J Esthet Dent 1992;4:114-116.
9. Chuang SF, Liu JK, Chao CC, Liao FP, Chen YH. Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations. J Prosth Dent 2000;85:177-183.
10. Ciucchi B, Bouillaguet S. Handling of bonding agents: biocompatibility aspects. International Symposium Bologne 1996;37-47.
11. Crim GA, Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage: the effect of storage and cycling duration. J Prosth Dent 1987;57:574-576.
12. Fayyad MA, Shortall ACC. Microleakage of dentin-bonded posterior composite restorations. J Dent 1987;15:67-72.
13. Ferrari M, Mason PN, Vichi A, Davidson CI. Role of hybridation on marginal leakage and bond strength. Am J Dent 2000;13:329-338.
14. Ferrari M, Garcia-Godoy F. Sealing ability of last generation of adhesive-restorative materials placed on vital teeth. Am J Dent 2002;15:117-128.
15. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Fatigue behaviour of different dentin adhesives. Clin Oral Invest 1999;3:11-17.
16. Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. "No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhesives - a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 2001;17:373-380.
17. Gwinnett JA, Tay FR, Pang KM, Wei SHY. Comparison of three methods of critical evaluation of microleakage along restorative interfaces. J Prosth Dent 1995;74:575-585.
18. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Wright GZ, Braverman I. Microleakage of sealants after conventional, bur and air-abrasion preparation of pits and fissures. Pediatr Dent 1998;20:173-176.
19. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G., Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:237-245.
20. Nakabayashi N, Takarada K. Effect of HEMA on bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 1992;8:125-130.
21. Perdigao J, Baratieri LN, Lopes M. Laboratory evaluation and clinical application of a new one-bottle adhesive. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:23-35.
22. Pilo R, Ben-Amar A. Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multiple-step dentin bonding agents. J Prosth Dent 1999;82:209-213.
23. Schuurs AH, Gruythuysen RJ, Wesselink PR. Pulp capping with adhesive resin-based composite vs. calcium hydroxide: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000;16:240-250.
24. Swift EJ, Triolo PT, Barkmeier WW, Bird JL, Bounds SJ. Effect of low viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. Am J Dent 1996;9:100-104.
25. Toledano M, Osario E, Osario R, Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage and SEM interfacial micromorphology of amalgam restorations using three adhesive systems. J Dent 2000;28:423-428.
26. Tung FF, Estefan D, Scherer W. Microleakage of a condensable resin composite: an in vitro investigation. Quintessence Int 2000;31:430-434.
27. Van Meerbeeck B, Perdigao J, Gladys S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Enamel and dentin adhesion. In: Schwartz RS, Summitt JB, Robbins JW (eds). Fundamentals of operative dentistry - A contemporary approach. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996:158-173.
28. Walshaw PR, Mc Comb D. Clinical considerations for optimal dentinal bonding. Quintessence Int 1996;27:619-625.
29. Yoshiyama M, Sano H, Ebisu S, Tagami J, Ciucchi B, Carvalho RM, Johnson MH, Pashley DH. Regional strength of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin. J Dent Res 1996;75:1404-1413.