Local vs. joint measurements for the entanglement of assistance

Quantum Information and Computation

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 64-83

  Laustsen, T ^a,b   Verstraete, F ^a,c   Van Enk, S J ^a  

^a LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Concurrence; Entanglement of Assistance; Quantum Measurements

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

CONCURRENCE; ENTANGLEMENT OF ASSISTANCE; JOINT MEASUREMENT; LOCAL MEASUREMENT; PROJECTIVE MEASUREMENT; QUANTUM MEASUREMENT; THREE-PARTY;

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

EID: 0141706992     PISSN: 15337146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. D. P. DiVincenzo, C. A. Fuchs, H. Mabuchi, J. A. Smolin, A. Thapliyal, and A. Uhlmann (1999), Entanglement of assistance, in Quantum Computing and Quantum Communications, Vol. 1509 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, edited by C. P. Williams, Springer-Verlag (Berlin), pp. 247-257, (quant-ph/9803033).
2. O. Cohen (1998), Unlocking hidden entanglement with classical information, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, pp. 2493-2496.
3. L. P. Hughston, R. Jozsa, and W. K. Wootters (1993), A complete classification of quantum ensembles having a given density matrix, Phys. Lett. A 183, pp. 14-18.
4. J. Walgate, A. J. Short, L. Hardy, and V. Vedral (2000), Local distinguishability of multipartite orthogonal quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, pp. 4972-4975, see also J. Walgate and L. Hardy (2002), Nonlocality, Asymmetry, and Distinguishing Bipartite States, quant-ph/0202034.
5. J. Walgate, A. J. Short, L. Hardy, and V. Vedral (2000), Local distinguishability of multipartite orthogonal quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, pp. 4972-4975, see also J. Walgate and L. Hardy (2002), Nonlocality, Asymmetry, and Distinguishing Bipartite States, quant-ph/0202034.
6. S. Hill and W. K. Wootters (1997), Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, pp. 5022-5025.
7. W. K. Wootters (1998), Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, pp. 2245-2248.
8. G. Vidal (2000), Entanglement monotones, J. Mod. Opt. 47, pp. 355-376.
9. V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W. K. Wootters (2000), Distributed entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 61, no. 052306.
10. K. M. O'Connor and W. K. Wootters (2001), Entangled rings, Phys. Rev. A 63, no. 052302.
11. C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters (1996), Mixed-state entanglement end quantum error correction, Phys. Rev. A 54, pp. 3824-3851.
12. K. Audenaert, F. Verstraete, and B. De Moor (2001), Variational characterizations of separability and entanglement of formation, Phys. Rev. A 64, no. 052304.
13. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang (2000), Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press.
14. C. A. Fuchs (1998), unpublished notes.
15. R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson (1985), Matrix Analysis, Cambridge University Press.
16. F. Verstraete, J. Dehaene, B. De Moor, and H. Verschelde, Phys. Rev. A 65, 052112 (2002).
17. P. K. MacKeown (1997), Stochastic Simulation in Physics, Springer-Verlag (Singapore).