Superimposing display space on workspace in the context of endoscopic surgery

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 1999, Pages 284-285

  Mandryk, Regan L ^a   MacKenzie, Christine L ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Interaction devices; Minimally invasive surgery; Remote manipulation; Visualization

Indexed keywords

DISPLAY CONDITIONS; ENDOSCOPIC CAMERA; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; IMAGE DISPLAY; INTERACTION DEVICES; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATING THEATRE; REMOTE MANIPULATION;

FLOW VISUALIZATION; HUMAN ENGINEERING;

ENDOSCOPY;

EID: 0141701087     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/632716.632890     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. Crosthwaite, G., Chung, T., Dunkley, P,. Shimi, s., Cuschieri, A. Comparison of direct vision and electronic 2- and 3-D display systems on surgical task efficiency in endoscopic surgery. Annals of Surgery 82, 1995, 849-851.
2. Graham, E.D., and MacKenzie, C.L. Pointing on a Computer Display. CH1 '95 Conference Companion, (Denver CO, 1995), ACM Press, 314-315.
3. Graham, E.D., and MacKenzie, C.L. Physical vs Virtual Pointing. Proceedings of CHI '96, (Vancouver BC 1996), ACM Press, 292-299.
4. Hanna, G.B., Shimi, S.M., Cuschieri, A. Randomised study of influence of 2-D versus 3-D imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet, 351, 1998, 248-251.
5. Hanna, G.B., Shimi, S.M., Cuschieri, A. Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display. Annals of Surgery, 227 (4), 1998, 481-484.