Redescription and reevaluation of the generic status of Leptodactylus dantasi (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae) and description of its unusual advertisement call

Journal of Herpetology

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 490-497

  De Souza, Moisés B ^a,b   Haddad, Célio F B ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO ACRE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPHIBIA; ANURA; HYDROLAETARE DANTASI; HYDROLAETARE SCHMIDTI; LEPTODACTYLIDAE; LEPTODACTYLUS; LEPTODACTYLUS DANTASI;

EID: 0141684754     PISSN: 00221511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1670/259-01A     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. BOKERMANN, W. C. A. 1959. Una nueva especie de Leptodactylus de la region Amazonica (Amphibia, Salientia, Leptodactylidae). Neotropica 5:5-8.
2. CARDOSO, A. J., AND W. R. HEYER. 1995. Advertisement, aggressive, and possible seismic signals of the frog Leptodactylus syphax (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Alytes 13:67-73.
3. CEI, J. M. 1980. Amphibians of Argentina. Monitore Zoologico Italafia (N.S.): Monogr. 2:1-609.
4. COCHRAN, D. M., AND C. J. GOIN. 1959. A new frog of the genus Limnomedusa from Colombia. Copeia 1959:208-210.
5. _. 1970. Frogs of Colombia. United States National Museum Bulletin 288:1-655.
6. DUELLMAN, W. E. 2001. The Hylid Frogs of Middle America. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles/Natural History Museum of the Univ. of Kansas, Ithaca, NY.
7. FROST, D. R. (ED.). 1985. Amphibian Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographical Reference. Allen Press, Lawrence, KS.
8. _. 2000. Amphibian Species of the World [online]. Vers. 2.20. 1 September 2000. American Museum of Natural History, New York. 〈http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html〉.
9. GALLARDO, J. M. 1963. Hydrolaetare, nuevo genero de Leptodactylidae (Amphibia) Neotropical. Neotropica 9:42-48.
10. HEYER, W. R. 1970. Studies on the frogs of the genus Leptodactylus (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae). VI. Biosystematics of the melanonotus group. Contributions in Science, Natural History Museum, Los Angeles County 191:1-48.
11. HEYER, W. R., A. S. RAND, C. A. G. CRUZ, O. L. PEIXOTO, AND C. E. NELSON. 1990. Frogs of Boracéia. Arquivos de Zoologia, São Paulo 31:231-410.
12. HÖDL, W., AND G. GOLLMANN. 1986. Distress calls in Neotropical frogs. Amphibia-Reptilia 7:11-21.
13. LEWIS, E. R., AND P. M. NARINS. 1985. Do frogs communicate with seismic signals? Science 227:187-189.
14. LYNCH, J. D. 1971. Evolutionary relationships, osteology, and zoogeography of leptodactyloid frogs. Univ. of Kansas Museum of Natural History, Miscellaneous Publication 53:1-238.
15. MARTINS, M., AND C. F. B. HADDAD. 1988. Vocalizations and reproductive behaviour in the Smith Frog, Hyla faber Wied (Amphibia: Hylidae). Amphibia-Reptilia 9:49-60.
16. NARINS, P. M. 1995. Comparative aspects of interactive communication. In A. Flock (ed.), Active Hearing, pp. 363-372. Elsevier Science, Ltd., Amsterdam, Holland.
17. RODRIGUEZ, L. O., AND W. E. DUELLMAN. 1994. Guide to the frogs of the Iquitos region, Amazonian Peru. Univ. of Kansas Natural History Museum, Special Publication 22:1-80.
18. SAVAGE, J. M., AND W. R. HEYER. 1967. Variation and distribution in the tree-frog genus Phyllomedusa in Costa Rica, Central America. Beiträge zur Neotropical Fauna 5:111-131.
19. _. 1997. Digital webbing formulae for anurans: a refinement. Herpetological Review 28:131.