Superiority of electrocautery over the suture method for achieving cervical cone bed hemostasis

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 726-730

  Kamat, Aparna A ^a   Kramer, Paul ^b   Soisson, Andrew P ^b  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CAUTERIZATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STENOSIS; STUDENT T TEST; SUTURE; UTERINE CERVICITIS; UTERINE CERVIX DYSPLASIA;

EID: 0141682506     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00622-7     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Cirisano F.D. Management of pre-invasive disease of the cervix. Semin Surg Oncol. 16:1999;222-227.
2. Singer A., Walker P. What is the optimal treatment for cervical premalignancy? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 89:1982;335-337.
3. Eduardo A.M., Dinh T.V., Hannigan E.V., Yandell R.V., Schnadig V.J. Outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Can it replace cold knife conization? J Reprod Med. 41:(10):1996;729-732.
4. Oyesanya O.A., Amerasinghe C.N., Manning E.A. Outpatient excisional management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia A prospective randomized comparison between loop diathermy excision and laser excisional conization . Am J Obstet Gynecol. 168:1993;485-488.
5. Khunamornpong S., Raungrongmorakot K., Siriaunksul S. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital Problems in pathologic evaluation . J Med Assoc Thai. 84:2001;507-514.
6. Mathevet P., Dargent D., Roy M., Beau G. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization Cold knife, laser, and LEEP . Gynecol Oncol. 54:1994;175-179.
7. Larsson G., Gullberg B., Grundsell H. A comparison of complications of laser and cold knife conization. Obstet Gynecol. 62:1983;213-217.
8. Luesley D.M., McCrum A., Terry P.B. Complications of cone biopsy related to the dimensions of the cone and the influence of prior colposcopic assessment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 92:1985;158-164.
9. Tangtrakul S., Srisupundit S., Linasmita V. A randomized study comparing suture with non-suture cold-knife conization. J Obstet Gynaecol. 21:1995;587-591.
10. Gilbert L., Saunders G., Stringer R. Hemostasis and cold knife cone biopsy A prospective randomized trial comparing a suture versus non-suture technique . Obstet Gynecol. 74:1989;640-643.
11. Claman A.D., Lee N. Factors that relate to complications of cone biopsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 120:1974;124-128.
12. Martin-Hirsch PL, Kitchener H. Interventions for preventing blood loss during the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;(2):CD001421.
13. Mathevet P., Chemali E., Roy M., Dargent D. Longterm outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization Cold knife, laser, and LEEP . Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 106:2003;214-218.