Population monotonic allocation schemes in Bankruptcy games

Annals of Operations Research

Volumn 109, Issue 1-4, 2002, Pages 317-329

  Grahn, Sofia ^a   Voorneveld, Mark ^b  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b STOCKHOLM SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bankruptcy problems; Population monotonic allocation scheme

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141682349     PISSN: 02545330     EISSN: 15729338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1016316622277     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. R.J. Aumann, On the state of the art in game theory, Games and Economic Behavior 24 (1998) 181-210.
2. R.J. Aumann and M. Maschler, Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud, Journal of Economic Theory 36 (1985) 195-213.
3. I.J. Curiel, M. Maschler and S.H. Tijs, Bankruptcy games, Zeitschrift für Operations Research 31 (1988) 143-159.
4. N. Dagan, New characterizations of old bankruptcy rules, Social Choice and Welfare 13 (1996) 51-59.
5. M. Maschler, Some tips concerning application of game theory to real problems, in: Game Practice: Contributions from Applied Game Theory, eds. F. Palrone, I. García-Jurado and S. Tijs (Kluwer Academic, Boston, 1999).
6. B. O'Neill, A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud, Mathematical Social Sciences 2 (1982) 345-371.
7. F. Patrone, I. García-Jurado and S. Tijs, eds., Game Practice: Contributions from Applied Game Theory (Kluwer Academic, Boston, 1999).
8. Y. Sprumont, Population monotonic allocation schemes for cooperative games with transferable utility, Games and Economic Behavior 2 (1990) 378-394.
9. W. Thomson, Population monotonic allocation rules, in: Social Choice, Welfare and Ethics, eds. W.A. Barnett, H. Moulin, M. Salles and N.J. Schofield (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995) pp. 79-124.
10. H.P. Young, On dividing an amount according to individual claims or liabilities, Mathematics of Operations Research 12 (1987) 398-414.