Bootstrapped learning of novel objects

Journal of Vision

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 413-422

  Brady, Mark J ^a   Kersten, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Background; Bottom up; Camouflage; Clutter; Color; Learning; Mechanochemical; Morphogenesis; Motion; Novel objects; Object recognition; Segmentation; Top down

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; COLOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COLOR VISION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; LEARNING; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ANIMALS; COLOR PERCEPTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBABILITY LEARNING; SENSORY THRESHOLDS;

EID: 0141677830     PISSN: 15347362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/3.6.2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Amit, Y., & Geman, D. (1999). A computational model for visual selection. Neural Computation, 11(7), 1691-1715.
2. Ball, P. (1999). The Self-Made Tapestry (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Ben-Shahar, O., Huggins, P. S., & Zucker, S. W. (2002). On computing visual flows with boundaries: The case of shading and edges. In H. H. Bülthoff, S.-W. Lee, T. Poggio, & C. Wallraven (Eds.), Biologically motivated computer vision, BMCV 2002, (2525 ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
4. Braddick, O. J. (1974). A short-range process in apparent motion. Vision Research, 14, 519-527.
5. Brady, M. (1999). Growing Digital Embryos, from
6. Brady, M., & Kersten, D. (2000). The Camouflage Challenge, from http://gandalf.psych.umn.edu/~kersten/kersten-lab/camouflage/ camouflageChallenge.html
7. Brady, M. J. (1999). Psychophysical investigations of incomplete forms and forms with background. Ph. D. Thesis. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
8. Brown, J. L. (1975). The Evolution of Behavior. New York: W. W. Norton.
9. Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. (2001). Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes. Psychological science, 12(6), 499-504.
10. Lamme, V. (1995). The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 15(2), 1605-1615.
11. Malik, J., Belongie, S., Leung, T., & Shi, J. (2001). Contour and texture analysis for image segmentation. International Journal of Computer Vision, 43(1), 7-27.
12. Murray, J. D. (1993). Mathematical Biology (2nd, corrected ed. Vol. 19). Berlin: Springer.
13. Poggio, T., Torre, V., & Koch, C. (1985). Computational vision and regularization theory. Nature, 317, 314-319.
14. Shams, L., Brady, M. J., & Schaal, S. K. (2001). Graph matching vs. mutual information maximization for object detection. Neural Networks, 14 (3), 345-354.
15. Thayer, G. (1909). Concealing-Coloration in the Animal Kingdom. New York: Macmillian.
16. Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520-522.
17. Tu, Z., & Zhu, S. (2002a). Image segmentation by data-driven markov chain monte carlo. IEEE Tranactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(5), 657-673.
18. Tu, Z., & Zhu, S. (2002b, May). Parsing images into region and curve processes. Paper presented at the 7th European Conference on Computer Visions, Copenhagen, Denmark.
19. Weber, M., Welling, M., & Perona, P. (2000). Unsupervised learning of models for recognition. Paper presented at the 6th European Conference on Computer Vision, ECCV2000, Dublin, Ireland.
20. Yuille, A. (1991). Deformable templates for face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3(1), 59-70.