Lessons learned from interlaboratory comparisons of bioassay data interpretation

Radiation Protection Dosimetry

Volumn 105, Issue 1-4, 2003, Pages 427-432

  Doerfel, Hans ^a   Andrasi, A ^b   Bailey, M ^c   Berkovski, V ^d   Castellani, C M ^e   Hurtgen, C ^f   Jourdain, J R ^g   LeGuen, B ^h  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b KFKI ATOMIC ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Hungary)

^c PUBLIC HEALTH ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^d Radiation Protection Institute Kiev   (Ukraine)

^e ENEA   (Italy)

^f BELGIAN NUCLEAR RESEARCH CENTRE   (Belgium)

^g Inst Radiol Protect/Nucl Safety   (France)

^h EDF R AND D   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCREDITATION; ARTICLE; BIOASSAY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DATA ANALYSIS; DOSIMETRY; EUROPE; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABORATORY TEST; PERFORMANCE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RESPIRATORY SYSTEM;

EID: 0141675161     PISSN: 01448420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006274     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Kathreen, R. L., Heid, K. R. and Swinth, M. J. C. Comparisons of estimates of systemic Pu from uranium excretion. Health Phys. 30(5), 487-493 (1987).
2. 6 at the Sequoyah Fuels Corporation facility at Gore, Oklahoma. NUREG-1189 (Washington. DC: Nuclear Regulatory Commission) (1986).
3. Labone, T. R. A review of some internal dosimetry computer codes. WSRC-MS-91-291 (Aiken, SC: Westinghouse Savannah River Co.) (1991).
4. Ramsden, D., Birchall, A., Bull, R. K., Foster, P. P., Gibson, J. A. B., Strong, R., Taylor, N. A., Tyler, G. R. and Wraight, J. Laboratory intercomparison of method used for the assessments of systemic burdens of plutonium. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 30(2), 95-99 (1990).
5. Ramsden, D., and 11 others. Laboratory intercomparisons on internal dosimetry: Part II. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 42(2), 97-102 (1992).
6. Gibson, J. A., Birchall, A., Bull, R. K., Henrichs, K., Iranzo, E., Lord, D. J., Piechowski. J., Sollett, E., Tancock, N. P. and Wernli, C. A European intercomparison of methods used for the assessment of intakes of internally deposited radionuclides, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 40, 245-257 (1992).
7. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection. ICRP Publications 66. Ann. ICRP 24(1-3) (Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd) (1994).
8. Thieme, M., Hunt, E. L., Konig, K., Schmitt-Hanning, A. and Godde, R. The 1995/96 European intercomparison of in vivo monitoring systems. CEC report to be published.
9. Hui, T. E., Loesch, R. M., Raddatz, C., Fisher, D. R. and McDonald, J. C. An internal dose intercomparison study. Health Phys. 67(3), 217-225 (1994).
10. Hui, T. E., Loesch, R. M. and McDonald, J. C. The second internal dosimetry intercomparison study of the U.S. Department of Energy. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 72(2), 131-138 (1997).
11. International Atomic Energy Agency. Intercomparison and biokinetic model validation of radionuclide intake assessment. Report of a co-ordinated research project 1996-1998, IAEA-TECDOC-1071 (1999).
12. Doerfel, H., Andrasi, A., Bailey, M., Birchall, A., Castellani, C., Hurtgen, C., Jarvis, N., Johansson, L., LeGuen, B. and Tarroni, G. Third European intercomparison exercise on internal dose assessment: results of a research programme in the framework of the EULEP/EURADOS Action Group 'Derivation of parameter values for application to the model of the human respiratory tract for occupational exposure' 1997-1999. Report of the Research Centre Karlsruhe, FZKA 6457, (2000).