The attentional repulsion effect in perception and action

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 152, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 376-382

  Pratt, Jay ^a   Turk Browne, Nicholas B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Action; Attention; Cues; Human; Perception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISSOCIATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; VISION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 0141674973     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1557-7     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aglioti S, DeSouza JFX, Goodale MA (1995) Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Curr Biol 5:679-685
2. Bennett PJ, Pratt J (2001) The spatial distribution of inhibition of return. Psychol Sci 12:76-80
3. Berger A, Dori H, Henik A (1999) Peripheral noninformative cues do induce early facilitation of target detection. Eur J Cognit Psychol 11:119-137
4. Dyde RT, Milner A.D (2002) Two illusions of perceived orientation: one fools all the people some of the time; the other fools all of the people all of the time. Exp Brain Res 144:518-527
5. Franz VH, Gegenfurtner KR, Bülthoff HH, Fahle M (2000) Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychol Sci 11:20-25
6. Gentilucci M, Chieffi S, Dapratti E, Seatti MC, Toni I (1996) Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia 34:369-376
7. Goodale MA, Humphrey GK (1998) The objects of perception and action. Cognition 67:181-207
8. Goodale MA, Milner AD (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15:20-25
9. Goodale MA, Murphy K (1997) Action and perception in the visual periphery. In: Their P, Karnath H-O (eds) Parietal lobe contributions to orientation in 3D space. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 447-461
10. Haffenden AM, Goodale MA (1998) The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. J Cognit Neurosci 10:122-136
11. Haffenden AM, Goodale MA (2000) Independent effects of pictorial displays on perception and action. Vision Res 40:1597-1607
12. Haffenden AM, Schiff KC, Goodale MA (2000) The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp. Curr Biol 11:177-181
13. Klein R M (2000) Inhibition of return. Trends Cognit Sci 4:138-147
14. Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, Oxford
15. Posner MI (1980) Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 32:3-25
16. Posner MI, Cohen Y (1984) Components of visual orienting. In: Bouma H, Bouwhuis DG (eds) Attention and performance, vol X. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 531-556
17. Suzuki S, Cavanagh P (1997) Focussed attention distorts visual space: an attentional repulsion effect. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:443-463
18. Vishton PM, Rea JG, Cutting JE, Nuñez LN (1999) Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: relative versus absolute, not perception versus action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:1659-1672
19. Wong E, Mack A (1981) Saccadic programming and perceived location. Acta Psychol 48:123-131
20. Wraga M, Creem SH, Proffitt DR (2000) Perception-action dissociations of a walkable Müller-Lyer configuration. Psychol Sci 11:239-243
21. Yantis S, Hillstrom AP (1994) Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:95-107