A case study on the adaptive maintenance of an internet application

Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 245-264

  Bergin, Susan ^a   Keating, John ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Java; Maintenance evaluation model; Object oriented development; The UML; Web based technologies

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; TAXATION; WORLD WIDE WEB;

MAINTENANCE EVALUATION MODEL; MOBILE PHONE; OBJECT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE;

EID: 0141674961     PISSN: 1532060X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smr.275     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Murtagh F, Keating J, Bergin S, Harner C, McParland G, Farid M. The Evolution of Telecom Technologies: Current Trends and Near-Future Implications. The Centre for Cross Border Studies: Armagh, Northern Ireland, 2001; 105.
2. IEEE Computer Society. IEEE Standard for Software Maintenance, IEEE Std, 1219-1998. The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers: New York, 1998, 47.
3. Gustafsson J, Paakki J, Nenonen K, Verkamo AI. Architecture-centric software evolution by software metrics and design patterns. Proceedings Sixth European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering CSMR 2002. IEEE Computer Society: Los Alamitos CA, 2002: 108-115.
4. Burge J. Design rationale for software maintenance. Proceedings 16th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE 2001. IEEE Computer Society: Los Alamitos CA, 2001; 433.
5. Layzell P. Addressing the software evolution crisis through a service-oriented view of software: A roadmap for software engineering and maintenance research. Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, ICSM 2001. IEEE Computer Society: Los Alamitos CA, 2001, 5.
6. Brereton PO, Budgen D, Bennett K, Murno M, Layzell PJ, Macaulay LA, Griffiths D, Stannett, C. The future of software: Defining the research agenda. Communications of the ACM 1999; 42(12):78-84.
7. Grefen D, Schneberger SL. The non-homogeneous maintenance periods: A case study of software modifications. Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, ICSM '96. IEEE Computer Society: Los Alamitos CA, 1996; 134-141.
8. Niessink F, Van Vliet H. Two case studies in measuring software maintenance effort. Proceedings International Conference on Software Maintenance, ICSM '98. IEEE Computer Society: Los Alamitos CA, 1998; 76-85.
9. Stark GE. Measurements for managing software maintenance. Proceedings International Conference on Software Maintenance, ICSM '96. IEEE Computer Society: Los Alamitos CA, 1996; 152-161.
10. Epping A, Lott CM. Does software design complexity affect maintenance effort? Proceedings of the NASA/GSFC 19th Annual Software Engineering Workshop. Software Engineering Laboratory: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center: Goddard MD, 1994; 1-16.
11. Jorgensen M. An empirical study of software maintenance tasks. Journal of Software Maintenance 1995; 7(1):27-48.
12. Basili V., Briand L, Condon S, Kim YM, Valent J. Understanding and predicting the process of software maintenance releases. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Software Engineering, ISEW 1996/ISCE 18. ACM Press: New York, 1996; 464-474.
13. Bergin S. Visualization and modelling of highly structured mobile phone pricing data. Master's Thesis, National University of Ireland. Maynooth, Ireland, 2001.
14. Pooley R. Stevens P. Using UML Software Engineering with Objects and Components. Addison-Wesley: Reading MA, 1999.
15. Apache Digital Corp. Apache Web Server Resource Center. Apache Corp.: Durango CO, 2003 http://www.apache.com/ [3 March 2003]
16. Finnish IT Center for Science. Comprehensive Perl Archive Network. Scientiic Computing Ltd.: Espoo, Finland, 2003. http://www.cpan.org/ [31 March 2003].
17. W3C. Common Gateway Interface. World Wide Web Consortium: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA, 2003 http://www.w3.org/CGI/ [31 March 2003].
18. ZZO Associates. JVM < _ > Perl5 Communication. ZZO Computing Solutions: Sunnyvale CA, 2003. http://www.zzo.com/pix/ [31 March 2003].
19. Halstead MH. Elements of Software Science. Elsevier North-Holland, Inc: New York, 1977.
20. Oman P, Hagemeister J. Metrics for assessing a software system's maintainability. Proceedings Conference on Software Maintenance, ICSM'92. IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos CA, 1992; 337-344.
21. McCabe TJ, Watson AH. Software complexity. CrossTalk The Journal of Defense Software Engineering 1994; 7(12):5-9.
22. Fenton NE, Pfleeger SL. Software Metrics A Rigorous and Practical Approach. PWS Publishing Company: Boston MA, 1997; 246-257.
23. Sommerville I. Software Engineering. Addision-Wesley: Reading MA, 1995: 659-673.