Teledermatology: An intraobserver diagnostic correlation study, part II

Cutis

Volumn 71, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 476-480

  Pak, Hon S ^a   Harden, David ^b   Cruess, David ^c   Welch, Mark L ^b   Poropatich, Ronald ^b  

^a BROOKE ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PATIENT CARE; SKIN BIOPSY; SKIN DISEASE; TELEPHONE TELEMETRY; BIOPSY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DERMATOLOGY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATHOLOGY; SKIN; STANDARD; TELEMEDICINE;

BIOPSY; DERMATOLOGY; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT CARE; SKIN; SKIN DISEASES; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 0141670713     PISSN: 00114162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Whited JD, Russell HP, Simel DL, et al. Reliability and accuracy of dermatologists' clinic-based and digital image consultations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;41:693-702.
2. Phillips CM, Burke WA, Allen MH, et al. Reliability of telemedicine in evaluating skin tumors. Telemed J. 1998;4:5-9.
3. Loane MA, Corbett R, Bloomer SE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical management by realtime teledermatology: results from the Northern Ireland arms of the UK Multicentre Teledermatology Trial. J Telemed Telecare. 1998;4:95-100.
4. Oakley AMM, Astwood DR, Loane M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of teledermatology: results of a preliminary study in New Zealand. N Z Med J. 1997;110:51-53.
5. Phillips CM, Burke WA, Shechter A, et al. Reliability of dennatology teleconsultations with the use of teleconferencing technology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;37:398-402.
6. Lesher JL, Davis LS, Gourdin FW, et al. Telemedicine evaluation of cutaneous diseases: a blinded comparative study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;38:27-31.
7. Lowitt MH, Kessler II, Kauffman L, et al. Teledermatology and in-person examinations. Arch Dermatol. 1998;134:471-476.
8. Loane MA, Gore HE, Corbett R, et al. Preliminary results from the Northern Ireland arms of the UK Multicentre Teledermatology Trial. J Telemed Telecare. 1998;4(suppl 1):3-5.
9. Oakley AMM, Duffill MB, Reeve P. Practising dermatology via telemedicine. N Z Med J. 1998;111:296-299.
10. Gilmour E, Campbell SM, Loane MA, et al. Comparison of teleconsultations and face-to-face consultations: preliminary results of a United Kingdom multicentre teledermatology study. Br J Dermatol. 1998;139:81-87.
11. Harrison PV, Kirby B, Dickinson Y, et al. Teledermatology - high technology or not? J Telemed Telecare. 1998;4:31-32.
12. Zelickson BD, Homan L. Teledermatology in the nursing home. Arch Dermatol. 1997;133:171-174.
13. Kvedar JC, Edwards RA, Menn ER, et al. The substitution of digital images for dermatologic physical examination. Arch Dermatol. 1997;133:161-167.
14. Whited JD, Mills BJ, Hall RP, et al. A pilot trial of digital imaging in skin cancer. J Telemed Telecare. 1998;4:108-112.