Development of a congruence scale based on the Satir model

Contemporary Family Therapy

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 217-239

  Lee, Bonnie K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Communal; Congruence; Creative; Interpersonal; Intrapsychic; Satir; Scale development; Spiritual

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141643235     PISSN: 08922764     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1014390009534     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alexander, J. F., Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Jameson, P. B. (1994). The process and outcome of marital and family therapy: Research, review and evaluation. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of pychotherapy and bhavior change (pp. 595-630). New York: Wiley and Sons.
2. Banmen, A., & Banmen, J. (Eds.). (1991). Meditations of Virginia Satir. Palo Alto: Science and Behavior Books.
3. Becvar, D., & Becvar, R. (1996). Family therapy: A systemic integration. Toronto: Allyn and Bacon.
4. Davis, B., McLendon, J., Freeman, M., Hill, N., Loberg, J., Lester, T. & Huber, C. (1996). Satir and congruence: A response. In B. J. Brothers (Ed.), Couples and the Tao of congruence (pp. 143-148). New York: Haworth Press.
5. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
6. Duhl, B. (1989). Virginia Satir: In memoriam. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15, 109-110.
7. Goldenberg, I. & Goldenberg, H. (1996). Family therapy: An overview (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
8. Gurman, A. S., Kniskern, D. P., & Pinsof, W. M. (1986). Research on marital and family therapies. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 565-624). New York: Wiley and Sons.
9. Lambert, M. J., & Burlingame, G. M. (1996). Outcome questionnaire. NJ: American Professional Credentialing Services LLC.
10. Lambert, M. J., Okiishi, J. C., Finch, A. E., & Johnson, L.D. (1998). Outcome assessment: From conceptualization to implementation. Professional Psychology, 29, 63-70.
11. Lee, B. (2002). Congruence in Satir's model: Its spiritual and religious significance. Contemporary Family Therapy, 24(1), 57-78.
12. Liddle, H. A. (1991). Empirical values and the culture of family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 17, 227-348.
13. Loeschen, S. (1998). Systematic training in the skills of Virginia Satir. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
14. Nichols, M. P., & Schwartz, R. C. (1998). Family therapy: Concepts and methods (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
15. Olson, D. H. (1976). Bridging research, theory, and application: The triple threat in science. In D. Olson (Ed.), Treating relationships (pp. 565-579). Lake Mills, IA: Graphics Press.
16. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164-172.
17. Satir, V. (1964). Conjoint family therapy. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
18. Satir, V. (1986). A partial portrait of a family therapist in process. In C. Fishman & B. Rosman (Eds.), Evolving models for family change (pp. 278-293). New York: Guilford Press.
19. Satir, V. (1988). The new peoplemaking. Mountain View, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
20. Satir, V., & Banmen, J. (1983). Virginia Satir verbatim. North Delta, B.C.: Delta Psychological Associates.
21. Satir, V., Banmen, J., Gerber, J., & Gomori, M. (1991). The Satir model: Family therapy and beyond. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
22. Sprenkle, D., Keeney, B., & Sutton, P. (1982). Theorists who influence clinical members of AAMFT: A research note. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 8, 367-369.
23. Sprenkle, D., & Moon, S. (Eds.). (1996). Research methods in family therapy. New York: Guilford Press.
24. Umphress, V. J., Lambert, M. J., Smart, D. W., Barlow, S. H., & Clouse, G. (1997). Concurrent and construct validity of the Outcome Questionnaire. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 15, 40-55.