A pulp mill benchmark problem for control: Problem description

Journal of Process Control

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 17-29

  Castro, J J ^a   Doyle III, F J ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b University of California   (United States)

^c Weyerhaeuser Co   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic modeling; Process control; Process simulation; Pulp mill process

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COSTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PAPER AND PULP MILLS; PULP MANUFACTURE;

CHEMICAL RECOVERY;

PROCESS CONTROL;

EID: 0141642163     PISSN: 09591524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-1524(03)00011-8     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. M. Barrette, M. Perrier, Modeling and control of a hypochiorite bleaching stage for dissolving pulp, in: TAPPI Proc. of the 1995 Process Control Conference, TAPPI Press, Atlanta, 1995, pp. 11-22.
2. Castro J.J., Doyle F.J. III Plantwide control of the fiber line in a pulp mill. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41(5):2002;1310-1320.
3. Christensen T., Albright L.F., Williams T.J. A Mathematical Model of the Kraft Pulping Process, Technical Report 129. 1979;Purdue Laboratory for Applied Industrial Control, Schools of Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette.
4. Downs J.J., Vogel E.F. A plant-wide industrial process control problem. Chem. Eng. Sci. 17(3):1993;245-255.
5. Galtung F.L., Williams T.J. A survey of the statues of the mathematical modeling of the chemical recovery section of a Kraft paper mill, Technical Report 23. 1969;Purdue Laboratory for Applied Industrial Control, Schools of Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette.
6. T.M. Grace, E.W. Malcolm (Eds.), Alkaline Pulping, Pulp and Paper Manufacture, Vol. 5, third ed., Technical Session of Canadian Pulp and Paper Association, 1989.
7. Jacobi E.F., Williams T.J. A dynamic model and advanced direct digital control system for a Kraft mill liquor preparation system, Technical Report 56. 1973;Purdue Laboratory for Applied Industrial Control, Schools of Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette.
8. Kanadibhotla R.S., Riggs J.B. Nonlinear model based control of a recycle reactor process. (Comptit. Chem. Engng. 19(8):1995;933-948.
9. F. Kayihan, A review of modeling and control in pulp and paper industries, in: 5th International Conference on Chemical Process Control (CPC V), AIChE Symp. Ser., 1997, pp. 117-132.
10. Lakshmanan C.C., Potter O.E. Cinematic modeling of dynamics of counter-current systems. Comput. Chem. Engng. 14(9):1990;945-956.
11. Luyben M.L., Luyben W.L. Design and control of a complex process involving two reaction steps, three distillation columns, and two recycle streams. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 34(11):1995;3885-3898.
12. Lyman P.R., Georgakis C. Plant-wide control of the Tennessee Eastman problem. Comput. Chem. Engng. 19(3):1995;321.
13. McAvoy T.J., Ye N. Base control for the Tennessee Eastman problem. Comput. Chem. Engng. 18(5):1994;383-413.
14. McAvoy T.J., Ye N., Gang C. Nonlinear inferential parallel cascade control. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35(1):1996;130-137.
15. Prett D.M., Garc̀a C.E., Ramaker B.L. The Second Shell Process Control Workshop. 1988;Butterworth, Stoneham.
16. Prett D.M., Moran M. Shell Process Control Workshop. 1987;Butterworth, Stoneham.
17. Ricker N.L. Decentralized control of the Tennessee Eastman challenge process. J. Proc. Cont. 6(4):1996;205-221.
18. Ricker N.L., Lee J.H. Nonlinear model predictive control of the Tennessee Eastman challenge process. Comput. Chem. Engng. 19(9):1995;961-981.
19. Schiesser W.E. The Numerical Method of Lines: Integration of Partial Differential Equations. 1991;Academic Press, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, London.