Systematic design of weighting matrices for the H∞ mixed sensitivity problem

Journal of Process Control

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 89-98

  Ortega, M G ^a   Rubio, F R ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA   (Spain)

Author keywords

H control; Mixed sensitivity problem; Process control; Weighting matrix

Indexed keywords

CLOSED LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; WEIGHING;

MIXED SENSITIVITY;

PROCESS CONTROL;

EID: 0141642157     PISSN: 09591524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-1524(03)00035-0     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Athans V., Agarwal S. Designing of a robust controller for a supersonic aircraft using ∞ approach. Control Eng. Practice. 6:1994;1051-1061.
2. ∞ Multivariable design methodology for a ship, in: Proc. of 3rd European Control Conference, Rome, Italy, 1995, pp. 607-612.
3. ∞ Controller for a flexible manipulator IEEE Trans. on Control Systems Technol. 3(4):1995;409-416.
4. Bergeon B., Martinez P., Coustal P., Granier J.P. Design of an active suspension system for a micro-gravity experiment. Control Eng. Practice. 4(11):1996;1491-1502.
5. ∞-optimization with application to motion-scaling. IEEE Trans. on Control Systems Technol. 4(3):1996;244-258.
6. Lee H., Hwang H. Design of two-degree-of-freedom robust controllers for a seeker scan loop system. International Journal of Control. 66(4):1997;517-537.
7. Imanari H., Morimatsu Y., Sekiguchi K., Ezure H., Matuoka R., Tokuda A., Otobe H. Looper ∞ control for hot-strip mills. IEEE Trans. Indust. App. 33(3):1997;790-796.
8. ∞ control of molten steel level in continous caster. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 6(2):1998;200-207.
9. Lin J.L., Tho B.C. Analysis and μ-based controller design for an electromagnetic suspension system. IEEE Trans. Educ. 41(2):1998;116-129.
10. ∞ control for maglev vehicles. IEEE Control Syst. 18(4):1998;18-25.
11. ∞ and μ-control methods. Trans. Inst. MC. 13(5):1991;241-252.
12. ∞ based loop shaping method and μ-synthesis. Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Decision and Control. 1:1991;533-538.
13. ∞ approach to feedback design with two objective functions. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control. 37(6):1992;820-824.
14. Anwar H.A.H.A. A Survey of Weighting Functions for ∞ Control. 1993;Control Systems Centre, Manchester. (Report No. 782).
15. Grimble M.J. Robust Industrial Control. Optimal Design Approach for Polynomial Systems. 1994;Prentice-Hall International (UK).
16. Meinsma G. Unstable and nonproper weights in ∞ control. Automatica. 31(11):1995;1655-1658.
17. Skogestad S., Postlethwaite I. Multivariable Feedback Control. Analysis and Design. 1996;John Wiley & Sons, New York.
18. Sebe N. A design of controllers for simultaneous ∞ control problem. International Journal of Systems Science. 30(1):1999;25-31.
19. ∞ control problems. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control. 34(8):1989;831-847.
20. ∞ control. International Journal of Control. 54(5):1991;1031-1073.
21. Balas G., Doyle J., Glover K., Packard A., Smith R. μ-Analysis and Synthesis Toolbox User's Guide. 2nd Edition:1995;The Math Works, Natick, MA.
22. Chiang R., Safonov M. Robust Control Toolbox User's Guide. 2nd Edition:1998;The MathWorks, Natick.
23. Zhou K., Doyle J.C., Glover K. Robust and Optimal Control. 1996;Prentice-Hall, NJ.
24. F. Castaño, F.R. Rubio, Application of a LQG/LTR controller to a pilot plant, in: Proceedings of CONTROLO'98, 1998.
25. D.R. Ramírez, D. Limón-Marruedo, J. Gómez-Ortega, E.F. Camach, Model based predictive control using genetic algorithms. Application to a pilot plant, in: Proceedings of the European Control Conference, ECC'99, 1989, pp. 81-85.
26. Ljung L. System Identification Toolbox. 1986;The Math Works.