Comparison of modified Mitscherlich and response plateau models for calibrating soil test based nitrogen recommendations for rice on typic ustropept

Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Volumn 34, Issue 17-18, 2003, Pages 2633-2643

  Alivelu, K ^a   Srivastava, S ^a   Rao, A Subba ^a   Singh, K N ^a   Selvakumari, G ^b   Raju, N S ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SOIL SCIENCE   (India)

^b TAMIL NADU AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Linear response plateau; Mitscherlich's equation; Quadratic response plateau; Rice; Soil test calibration

Indexed keywords

FERTILIZER; NITROGEN;

CALIBRATION; NITROGEN; RICE; SOIL TEST;

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CROP PRODUCTION; MODEL; NONHUMAN; PLANT GROWTH; RICE; SEASONAL VARIATION; SOIL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0141642058     PISSN: 00103624     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/CSS-120024790     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Cerrrato, M.E.; Blackmer, A.M. Comparison of models for describing com yield response to nitrogen fertilizer. Agron. J. 1990, 82, 138-143.
2. Paris, Q. The return of von Liebig's "law of minimum". Agron. J. 1992, 84, 1040-1046.
3. Sahrawat, K.L.; Burford, J.R. Modification of the alkaline permanganate method for assessing the availability of soil nitrogen in upland soils. Soil Sci. 1982, 133, 53-57.
4. Subbaiah, B.V.; Asija, G.L. A rapid method for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Curr. Sci. 1956, 25, 259-260.
5. Ramamoorthy, B.; Velayutham, M. Soil Test Crop Response Correlation Work in India; FAO: Rome, 1971; Vol. 41, 96.
6. Mombiela, F.A.; Nelson, L.A. Relationships among some biological and empirical fertilizer response models and use of the power family of transformations to identify an appropriate model. Agron. J. 1981, 73, 353-356.
7. Payton, F.V.; Rhue, R.D.; Hensel, D.R. Mitscherlich-Bray equation used to correlate soil phosphorus and potato yields. Agron. J. 1989, 81, 571-576.
8. Colwell, J.D. Estimating Fertilizer Requirements: A Quantitative Approach; CAB Int.: Wallingford, UK, 1994.
9. Waggoner, P.; Norvell, W.A. Fitting the law of minimum to fertilizer applications and crop yields. Agron. J. 1979, 71, 352-354.
10. Barreto, H.J.; Westerman, R.L. YIELDFIT: a computer programme for determining economic fertilization rates. J. Agron. Educ. 1987, 16, 11-14.
11. Nelson, L.A.; Voss, R.D.; Pesek, J.T. Agronomic and statistical evaluation of fertilizer response. In Fertilizer Technology and Use, 3rd Ed.; Engelstad, O.P., Ed.; SSSA: Madison, WI, 1985; 66-72.
12. Waugh, D.L.; Cate, R.B.; Nelson, L.A. Discontinuous Models for Rapid Correlation, Interpretation and Utilization of Soil Analysis and Fertilizer Response Data; Bulletin, Technical International Soil Fertility Evaluation and Improvement Program, North Carolina State Univ.: Raleigh, NC, 1973; 7.
13. Delong, D.M. The univariate procedure. In SAS User's Guide, Basics Ed.; SAS Inst.: Cary, NC, 1985; 1181-1191.
14. Patil, S.K.; Mishra, V.N.; Das, R.O.; Pal, A.R.; Katre, R.K. Response plateau models for soil test P calibration. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 1997, 45, 284-287.