Cases of Social Innovation: Lessons from Two Innovations in the 20th Century

Creativity Research Journal

Volumn 15, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 261-266

  Mumford, Michael D ^a   Moertl, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141639702     PISSN: 10400419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326934crj152&3_16     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: The Free Press.
2. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555-590.
3. Dougherty, D., & Hardy, B. F. (1996). Sustained innovation production in large mature firms. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 826-851.
4. Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A., & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24, 286-323.
5. Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725-747.
6. Feist, G. J., & German, M. E. (1998). The psychology of science: Review and integration of a nascent discipline. Review of General Psychology, 2, 3-47.
7. Gruber, H. E., & Wallace, D. B. (1999). The case study method and evolving systems approach for understanding unique creative people at work. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 93-115). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Gryskiewicz, S. S. (2000). Cashing in on creativity at work. Psychology Today, 33, 62-67.
9. Howell, J. M., & Higgins, C. A. (1988). Champions of technological innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 317-341.
10. Kanigel, R. (1997). The one best way: Frederick Winslow Taylor and the enigma of efficiency. New York: Penguin.
11. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
12. Landy, F. S. (1989). Psychology of work behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
13. Lehmann, N. (2000). The big test: The secret history of the American meritocracy. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
14. Martindale, C. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic styles. New York: Basic Books.
15. Mumford, M. D. (2002). Social innovation: Ten cases from Benjamin Franklin. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 253-266.
16. Nohari, K., & Gulati, S. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39, 799-825.
17. Policastro, E., & Gardner, H. (1999). From case studies to robust generalizations'. An approach to the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 213-225), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Root-Bernstein, R. (1999). Discovery. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzken (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity: (Vol. 1, pp. 559-571). San Diego, CA: Academic.
19. Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, creativity, and leadership: Historiometric inquiries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Sosik, J. J., Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. S. (1997). Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 89-103.
21. Weber, R. J., & Perkins, D. N. (1992). Inventive minds: Creativity in technology. New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Weisburg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226-259). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.