Can examination of WWW usage statistics and other indirect quality indicators help to distinguish the relative quality of medical websites?

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 4-15

  Hernández Borges, Angel A ^a,c   Macías Cervi, Pablo ^a   Gaspar Guardado, María Asunción ^a   Torres Álvarez De Arcaya, María Luisa ^b   Ruiz Rabaza, Ana ^b   Jiménez Sosa, Alejandro ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE CANARIAS   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO NUESTRA SEÑORA DE CANDELARIA   (Spain)

^c NONE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Computer communication networks; Cybermetrics; Health education; Information systems; Internet; Web metrics; Webometrics

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PEDIATRICS; RATING SCALE; REVIEW;

EID: 0141626242     PISSN: 14388871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1.1.e1     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Goldwein JW, Benjamin Y. Internet-based medical information: time to take charge. Ann Intern Med 1995;123:152-153.
2. Chi-Lum BI, Lundberg GD, Silberg WM. Physicians accessing the Internet, the PAI Project. An educational initiative. JAMA 1996;275:1361-1362.
3. LaPorte RE, on behalf of the Global Health Network. Internet server with targeted access would cure information deficiency in developing countries [Letter]. BMJ 1997;314:980.
4. Kassirer JP, Angell M. The Internet and the Journal. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1709-1710.
5. Bower H. Internet sees growth of unverified health claims [News]. BMJ 1996;313: 381.
6. Dyer C. Internet sales of prescription drugs investigated. BMJ 1996;313:645.
7. Editorial. The web of information inequality. Lancet 1997;349:1781.
8. Shapira Y, Talmor D, Artru AA, Lam AM. Resident education and unreviewed material. Anesth Analg 1996;83:886-891 (letter).
9. Impicciatore P, Pandolfini C, Casella N, Bonati M. Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. BMJ 1997; 314:1875-1879.
10. Hernández-Borges AA, Pareras LG, Jiménez A. Comparative analysis of pediatric mailing lists on the Internet. Pediatrics 1997, 100(2). URL: http: //www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/100/2/e8.
11. Hernández-Borges AA, Macías-Cervi P, Gaspar-Guardado MA, Torres-Álvarez de Arcaya ML, Ruiz-Rabaza A, Ormazábal-Ramos C. Assessing the Relative Quality of Internet Mailing Lists on Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine. Anesth Analg 1999 (in press).
12. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet. JAMA 1997;277:1244-1245.
13. Sullivan D. A Webmaster's Guide To Search Engines. URL: http://www.searchenginewatch.com/webmasters/index.html [accessed 1999 Apr 15]
14. Jadad AR, Gagliardi A. Rating health information on the Internet. Navigating to knowledge or to Babel? JAMA 1998;279:611-614.
15. LaPorte RE, Marler E, Akazawa S, et al. The death of the biomedical journals. BMJ 1995;310:1387-1390.
16. Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Towards quality management of medical information on the Internet: evaluation, labeling, and filtering of information. BMJ 1998; 317:1496-500.
17. International Committee of Medical Journals Editors. Policies for posting biomedical journal information on the Internet. JAMA 1997; 277:1808.
18. PubMed. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, USA. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/medline.html [accessed 1999 Apr 15]
19. Infoseek Corporation, URL: http://infoseek.go.com [accessed 1999 Apr 15]
20. Infoseek. Quick Reference to Syntax. URL: http://www.infoseek.com/Help? pg=SyntaxHelp.html [accessed 1999 Apr 15]
21. Lawrence S, Giles CL. Searching the world wide web. Science 1998; 280:98-100.
22. Tsafrir JS, Reis T. Using the citation index to assess performance. BMJ 1990; 301: 1333-4.
23. Hansson S. Impact factor as a misleading tool in evaluation of medical journals. Lancet 1995; 346: 906 (letter).
24. Health Information Technology Institute. Criteria for Assessing the Quality of Health Information on the Internet URL: http://www.mitretek.org/hiti/ showcase/documents/criteria.html [accessed 1999 Apr 15]
25. Kim P, Eng TR, Deering MJ, Maxfield A. Published criteria for evaluating health related websites. BMJ 1999;318: 647-9.
26. Kleinberg JM. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. URL :http://simon.cs.cornell.edu/home/kleinber/auth.pdf [accessed 1999 Apr 15]
27. Arunachalam S. Assuring quality and relevance of Internet information in the real world. BMJ 1998; 317:1501-2.
28. Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 1972; 178:471- 479.
29. W3C. Platform for Internet Content Selection (PICS). URL: http://www.w3.org/PICS [accessed 1999 Jun 8].
30. Almind TC, Ingwersen P. Informetric analyses on the World Wide Web: methodological approaches to "Webometrics". Journal of Documentation 1997; 53:404-26.
31. International Committee of Medical Journals Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. JAMA 1997;277:927-934.