Patterns of visual field defects in chronic angle-closure glaucoma with different disease severity

Ophthalmology

Volumn 110, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 1890-1894

  Lau, Ling Ing ^a   Liu, Catherine Jui Ling ^a,b   Chou, Joe Ching Kuang ^a,b   Hsu, Wen Ming ^a,b   Liu, Jorn Hon ^a,b  

^a TAIPEI VETERANS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLOSED ANGLE GLAUCOMA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DISEASE SEVERITY; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTIC NERVE LESION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

EID: 0141624940     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00666-3     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:389-93.
2. Thylefors B, Negrel AD. The global impact of glaucoma. Bull World Health Organ 1994;72:323-6.
3. Arkell SM, Lightman DA, Sommer A, et al. The prevalence of glaucoma among Eskimos of northwest Alaska. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:482-5.
4. Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, Alsbirk PH, et al. Glaucoma in Mongolia. A population-based survey in Hovsgol province, northern Mongolia. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:1235-41.
5. Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M, et al. Epidemiology of angle-closure glaucoma: prevalence, clinical types, and association with peripheral anterior chamber depth in the Egna-Neumarket Glaucoma Study. Ophthalmology 2000;107:998-1003.
6. Drance SM, Douglas GR, Airaksinen PJ, et al. Diffuse visual field loss in chronic open-angle and low-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1987;104:577-80.
7. Chauhan BC, Drance SM, Douglas GR, Johnson CA. Visual field damage in normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;108:636-42.
8. Douglas GR, Drance SM, Schulzer M. The visual field and nerve head in angle-closure glaucoma. A comparison of the effects of acute and chronic angle closure. Arch Ophthalmol 1975;93:409-11.
9. Dhillon B, Chew TK, Lim ASM. Field loss in primary angle closure glaucoma. Asia-Pac Ophthalmol 1990;2:85-7.
10. Horie T, Kitazawa Y, Nose H. Visual field changes in primary angle closure glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1975;19:108-15.
11. Rhee K, Kim YY, Nam DH, Jung HR. Comparison of visual field defects between primary open-angle glaucoma and chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma in the early or moderate stage of the disease. Korean J Ophthalmol 2001;15:27-31.
12. Congdon NG, Quigley HA, Hung PT, et al. Screening techniques for angle-closure glaucoma in rural Taiwan. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1996;74:113-9.
13. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:831-6.
14. Sharma AK, Goldberg I, Graham SL, Mohsin M. Comparison of the Humphrey Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) and full threshold strategies. J Glaucoma 2000;9: 20-7.
15. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study Investigators. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study: 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1445-55.
16. Katz J, Tielsch JM, Quigley HA, Sommer A. Automated perimetry detects visual field loss before manual Goldmann perimetry. Ophthalmology 1995;102:21-6.
17. Bonomi L, Marraffa M, Marchini G, Canali N. Perimetric defects after a single acute angle-closure glaucoma attack. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1999;237:908-14.
18. Heijl A, Lundqvist L. The frequency distribution of earliest glaucomatous visual field defects documented by automatic perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1984;62:658-64.