Evaluation of controller performance - Use of models derived by subspace identification

International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing

Volumn 17, Issue 7-9, 2003, Pages 527-552

  Bezergianni, S ^a   Georgakis, C ^b  

^a Lehigh University   (United States)

^b POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Controller performance assessment; Minimum variance control; Subspace identification

Indexed keywords

CLOSED LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE; STOCHASTIC CONTROL SYSTEMS; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION;

CONTROL EQUIPMENT;

EID: 0141620320     PISSN: 08906327     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acs.764     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ender DB. Process control performance: Not as good as you think. Control Engineering 1993; 40(10):180.
2. Harris TJ. Assessment of control loop performance, Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 1989; 67:856-861.
3. Harris TJ, Seppala CT, Desborough LD. A review of performance monitoring and assessment techniques for univariate and multivariate control systems. Journal of Process Control 1999; 9:1-17.
4. Thornhill NF, Oettinger M, Fedenczuk P. Refinery-wide control loop performance assessment. Journal of Process Control 1999; 9:109-124.
5. Harris TJ, Boudreau F, MacGregor JF. Performance assessment of multivariable feedback controllers. Automatica 1996;32(11):1505-1518.
6. Huang B, Shah SL, Kwok EK. How good is your controller? application of control loop performance assessment techniques to mimo processes. In IFAC proceedings, San Francisco, 13th Triennial World Congress, 1996; 229-234.
7. Huang B, Shah SL, Miller R. Feedforward plus feedback controller performance assessment of MIMO systems. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 2000; 8(3):580-587.
8. Tyler ML, Morari M. Performance monitoring of control systems using likelihood methods. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Seattle, Washington, 1995; 1245-1249.
9. Eriksson P-G, Isaksson AJ. Some aspects of control loop performance monitoring. In IEEE Conference on Control Applications, vol. 2. Glasgow, Scotland, UK, 1994; 1029-1034.
10. Bezergianni S, Georgakis C. Controller performance assessment based on minimum and open-loop output variance. Control Engineering Practice 2000; 8:791-797.
11. Swanda AP, Seborg DE. Controller performance assessment based on setpoint response data. In Proceedings ACC, San Diego, California, 1999; 3863-3867.
12. Qin SJ. Control performance monitoring - A review and assessment. Computers and Chemical Engineering 1998; 23:173-186.
13. Horch A, Isaksson AJ. A modified index for control performance assessment. Journal of Process Control 1999; 9:475-483.
14. Bezergianni S, Georgakis C. A control performance index based on minimum and open-loop output variance. In World Congress of IFAC, Beijing, China, 1999.
15. Fotopoulos J, Georgakis C, Stenger HG. Structured target factor analysis for the stoichiometric modeling of batch reactors. In Proceedings of American Control Conference, 1994.
16. Elnagaar A, Dumont GA, Elshafei A-L. Delay estimation using variable regression. In Proceedings of American Control Conference, 1991; 2812-2817.
17. Elnaqaar A. Variable Regression Estimation of Unknown System Delay. Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia, 1990.
18. Van Overschee P. Subspace Identification, Theory - Implementation - Application. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Electrical Engg., Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 1995.
19. Van Overschee P, De Moor B. A unifying theorem for three subspace system identification algorithms. In Proceedings of American Control Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, 1994; 1645-1649.
20. Verhaegen M, Dewilde P. Subspace model identification part 1. the output-error state-space model identification class of algorithms. International Journal of Control 1992; 56(5):1187-1210.
21. Verhaegen M. Application of a subspace model identification technique to identify LTI systems operating in closed-loop. Automatica 1993; 29(4): 1027-1040.
22. Van Den Hof PMJ, Schrama RJP. Identification and control-closed-loop issues. Automatica 1995; 31(12): 1751-1770.
23. Van Overschee P, De Moor B. Closed loop subspace system identification. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, CA, 1997; 1848-1853.
24. Chou CT, Verhaegen M. Subspace algorithms for the identification of multivariable dynamic errors-in-variables models. Automatica 1997; 33(10):1857-1869.
25. Abdelghani M, Verhaegen M, Van Overschee P, De Moor B. Comparison study of subspace identification methods applied to flexible structures. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 1998; 12(5):679-692.
26. Ljung L, MCKelvey T. Subspace identification from closed loop data. Signal Processing 1996; 209-215.
27. Gustavsson T. Subspace identification using instrumental variable techniques. Automatica 2001; 37(12):2005-2010.
28. Van Overschee P. Subspace Identification of Linear Systems. Theory - Implementation - Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.
29. Ogunnaike BA, Ray WH. Process Dynamics, Modeling, and Control. Oxford Press: New York, 1994.
30. Ziegler JG, Nichols NB. Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Transactions of A.S.M.E. 1943; 65:433-444.
31. Luyben WL, Björn D, Tyréus BD, Luyben ML. Plantwide Process Control. MCGraw-Hill: New York, 1999.
32. Luyben WL. Hybrid method for tuning pi controllers for lag/deadtime processes. In Presented at AIChE 1998 Meeting, Miami, FL, 1998.