WSARE: What's Strange about Recent Events?

Journal of Urban Health

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 2003, Pages

  Wong, Weng Keen ^a   Moore, Andrew ^a   Cooper, Gregory ^b   Wagner, Michael ^b  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Anomaly detection; Data mining; Detection algorithm; Multiple hypothesis testing; Syndromic surveillance

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; CITY; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONFERENCE PAPER; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; EMERGENCY WARD; EPIDEMIC; EVALUATION; FISHER EXACT TEST; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; SIMULATION; SYNDROME; TIME; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL WARFARE; INFECTION CONTROL; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; METHODOLOGY; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ALGORITHMS; BIOTERRORISM; DATA COLLECTION; DISEASE NOTIFICATION; DISEASE OUTBREAKS; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; HUMANS; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PUBLIC HEALTH INFORMATICS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0141611065     PISSN: 10993460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Wong W, Moore AW, Cooper G, Wagner M. Rule-based anomaly pattern detection for detecting disease outbreaks. In: Ford K, ed. Proceedings of the 18th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-02). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2002:217-223. Available at: www.autonlab.org/.
2. Lane T, Brodley CE. Temporal sequence learning and data reduction for anomaly detection. ACM Trans Inform Syst Security. 1999;2:295-331.
3. Eskin E. Anomaly detection over noisy data using learned probability distributions. In: Langley P, ed. Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-2000). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann; 2000:255-262.
4. Maxion RA, Tan KMC. Anomaly Detection in Embedded Systems. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University; 2001. Technical Report CMU-CS-01-157.
5. Wagner MM, Tsui FC, Espino JU, et al. The emerging science of very early detection of disease outbreaks. J Public Health Manage Pract. 2001;7(6):51-59.
6. Bishop CM. Novelty detection and neural network validation. IEEE ProcVision, Image Signal Proc. 1994;141:217-222.
7. Hamerly G, Elkan C. Bayesian approaches to failure prediction for disk drives. In: Brodley CE, Danyluk AP, eds. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann; 2001:202-209.
8. Bay SD, Pazzani MJ. Detecting change in categorical data: Mining contrast sets. In: Chaudhuri S, Madigan D, eds. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 1999:302-306.
9. Brin S, Motwani R, Ullman JD, Tsur S. Dynamic itemset counting and implication rules for market basket data. In: Peckham J, ed. SIGMOD 1997, Proceedings ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, May 13-15, 1997, Tucson, Arizona, USA. New York: ACM Press; 1997:255-264.
10. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc, Series B. 1995;57:289-300.
11. Good P. Permutation Tests-a Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypotheses. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2000.
12. Miller CJ, Genovese C, Nichol RC, et al. Controlling the False Discovery Rate in Astrophysical Data Analysis. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, 2001. Technical report #747.