The effects of practicing registration of organ donation preference on self-efficacy and registration intention: An enactive mastery experience

Psychology and Health

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 585-594

  Reubsaet, Astrid ^a   Brug, Johannes ^a,b   De Vet, Emely ^a   Van Den Borne, Bart ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adolescents; Intention; Organ donation; Registration; Self efficacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141575419     PISSN: 08870446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0887044031000094840     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, NJ.
2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.
3. Baron, R. and Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
4. Bem, D. (1972). Self-perception theory. In: Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 6, pp. 1-62. Academic Press, New York.
5. Birkimer, J., Barbee, A., Francis, M. and Berry, M. (1994). Effects of refutational messages, thought provocation, and decision deadlines on signing to donate organs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1735-1761.
6. Brug, J., van Vugt, M., van den Borne, B., Brouwers, A., and van Hooff, H. (2000). Predictors of willingness to register as an organ donor among Dutch adolescents. Psychology and Health, 15, 357-368.
7. Carducci, B. and Deuser, P. (1984). The Foot-in-the Donor Technique: intial request and organ donation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 5(1), 75-81.
8. Carducci, B., Deuser, P., Bauer, A., Large, M. and Ramaekers, M. (1989). An application of the foot in the door technique to organ donation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 4, 245-249.
9. Cleiren, M. and Zoelen, A. van (1998). Orgaandonatie and Nabestaanden: Winst and Verlies [Organ Donation and Next of Kin: Profit and Loss]. DSWO Press, Leiden.
10. Dutch Ministry of Health (2000). Press report. Kerkrade: Donorregister.
11. Dutch Ministry of Health (2001). Number of registered people in the Netherlands. Kerkrade: Donorregister.
12. Freedman, J. and Fraser, S. (1966). Compliance without pressure: the foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 195-202.
13. Judd, C. and Kenny, D. (1981). Estimating the evan Effects of Social Interventions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
14. Kenny, D., Kashy, D. and Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in Social Psychology. In: D. Gilbert, S. Fiske and G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, pp. 258-261. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
15. Kranenbrug, J., Willems, L., Sieber-Rasch, M., Geertsma, A. and Ploeg, R. (1998). Het Don Quichot onderzoek: donortekort of donatietekort? [The Don Quichot research: shortage of donors or shortage of donations?] Groningen: Academisch Ziekenhuis Groningen.
16. MacKinnon, D. (1994). Analysis of mediating variables in prevention and intervention research. NIDA Research Monograph Series, 139, 127-153.
17. Nolan, B. and McGarth, P. (1990). Social-cognitive influences on the willingness to donate organs. In: Shanteau J. and Jackson Harris R. (Eds.), Organ Donation and Transplantation: Psychological and Behavioral Factors, pp. 25-36. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
18. Radecki, C. and Jaccard, J. (1997). Psychological aspects of organ donation: a critical review and synthesis of individual and next-of-kin donation decisions. Health Psychology, 16(2), 183-195.
19. Reubsaet, A., Borne, B.v.d., Brag, J., Pruyn, J. and Hooff, H.v. (2001). Determinants .of the intention of Dutch adolescents to register as organ donors. Social Science and Medicine, 53, 383-392.
20. Reubsaet, A., Brug, J., Borne, B.v.d. and Hooff, J.v. (2001). Predictors of organ donation registration among Dutch adolescents. Transplantation, 72(1), 51-56.
21. Roels, L., Coosemans, W., Christiaens, M., Waer, M. and Vanrenterjjhem, Y. (1995). The relative impact of legislatives on multi-organ donation rates in Europe. Transplantation Proceedings, 27, 795-796.
22. Seldenrijk, R. (1993). Organen En Weefsels: Een Medisch-Ethische Afweging Van De Transplantatiegenees- kunde [Organs and Tissues: a Medical-Ethical Consideration of the Transplantation Medicine] Uitgeverij J.J Groen en Zoon, Leiden.
23. Smith, S., Morrison, K., Kopfman, J. and Ford, L. (1994). The influence of prior thought and intent on the memorability and persuasiveness of organ donation message strategies. Health Communication, 6(1), 1-20.