The feminist supervision scale: A rational/theoretical approach

Psychology of Women Quarterly

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 221-232

  Szymanski, Dawn M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141573539     PISSN: 03616843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1471-6402.00102     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ancis, J. R., & Ladany, N. (2000, August). An introduction to the Counseling Women Competencies Scale. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
2. Arbuckle, J. L. (1997). Amos 3.6 for windows, Chicago: SmallWaters.
3. Ault-Riche, M. (1988). Teaching an integrated model of family therapy: Women as students, women as supervisors. In L. Braverman (Ed.), A guide to feminist family therapy (pp. 175-192). New York: Harrington Park Press.
4. Bagozzi, R. P., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). A general approach to representing multifaceted personality variables: Application to state self-esteem. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 35-67.
5. Ballou, M., & Gabalac, N. W. (1985). A feminist position on mental health. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
6. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
7. nd ed.). Boston: Allyn &Bacon.
8. Brown, L. S. (1990). The meaning of a multicultural perspective for theory building in feminist therapy. In L. S. Brown & M. P. Root (Eds.), Diversity and complexity in feminist therapy (pp. 1-21). New York: Harrington Park Press.
9. Brown, L. S. (1994). Subversive dialogues. New York: Basic Books.
10. Bryant F. B., & Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Principal components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 99-136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11. Buchanan, T., & Smith, J. L. (1999). Using the Internet for psychological research: Personality testing on the World Wide Web. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 125-144.
12. Burisch, M. (1984). Approaches to personality inventory construction: A comparison of merits. American Psychologist, 39, 214-227.
13. Byrne, B. M. (1989). A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
15. Dutton Douglas, M. A., & Rave, E. (1990). Ethics of feminist supervision of psychotherapy. In H. Lerman & N. Porter (Eds.), Feminist ethics in psychotherapy (pp. 136-146). New York: Springer.
16. Efstation, J. F., Patton, M. J., & Kardash, C. M. (1990). Measuring the working alliance in counselor supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 322-329.
17. Enns, C. Z. (1993). Twenty years of feminist counseling and therapy: From naming biases to implementing multifaceted practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 21, 3-87.
18. Enns, C. Z. (1997). Feminist theories and feminist psychotherapies: Origins, themes, and variations. New York: Haworth.
19. Espin, O. M., & Gawelek, M. A. (1992). Women's diversity: Ethnicity, race, class and gender in theories of feminist psychology. In M. Ballou & L. S. Brown (Eds.), Personality and psychopathology: Feminist reappraisals (pp. 88-107). New York: Guilford.
20. Feminist Therapy Institute. (1990). Feminist Therapy Institute Code of Ethics. In H. Lerman & N. Porter (Eds.), Feminist ethics in psychotherapy (pp. 37-40). New York: Springer.
21. Fitzgerald, L. F., & Nutt, R. (1986). The Division 17 Principles Concerning the Counseling/Psychotherapy of Women: Rationale and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 14, 180-216.
22. Hagstrom, A. H., & Gutierrez, P. M. (1998). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Multi-Attitude Suicide Tendency Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 20, 173-186.
23. Hill, M., & Rothblum, E. D. (Eds.). (1996). Classism and feminist therapy: Counting costs. New York: Harrington Park Press.
24. Holloway, E. L. (1995). Clinical supervision: A systems approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. hooks, b. (1984). Feminist theory; From margin to center. Boston: South End Press.
26. Kimmel, E., & Worell, J. (1997). Preaching what we practice: Principles and strategies of feminist pedagogy. In J. Worell & N. G. Johnson (Eds.), Shaping the future of feminist psychology: Education, research, and practice (pp. 121-153). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
27. Litch, M. H. (1995). Multiple regression and correlation. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 19-64). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28. Lopez, S. R., Grover, K. P., Holland, D., Johnson, M. D., Kain, C. D., Kanel, K., Mellino, C. A., & Rhyne, M. C. (1989). Development of culturally sensitive therapy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 20, 369-376.
29. Martinez, L. J., Cue Davis, K., & Dahl, B. (1999). Feminist ethical challenges in supervision: A trainee perspective. Women & Therapy, 22(4), 35-54.
30. McHugh, M. C., & Frieze, I. H. (1997). The measurement of gender-role attitudes: A review and commentary. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 1-16.
31. Michalak, E. E., & Szabo, A. (1998). Guidelines for internet research: An update. European Psychologist, 3(1), 70-75.
32. Morgan, B. L. (1996). Putting the feminism into Feminism Scales: Introduction of a Liberal Feminist Attitude and Ideology Scale (LFAIS). Sex Roles, 34, 359-391.
33. Pearlman, S. (1987). The saga of continuing clash in lesbian community, or will an army of ex-lovers fail?In Boston Lesbian Psychologies Collective (Ed.) Lesbian psychologies: Explorations and challenges (pp. 312-326), Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
34. Ponterotto, J. G., Gretchen, D., Utsey, S. O., Reiger, B. P., & Autsin, R. (2000). A construct validity study of the Multicultural Counseling Awareness Scale (MCAS). Unpublished manuscript.
35. Ponterotto, J. R., Rieger, B. P., Barrett, A., Sparks, R., Sanchez, C. M., & Magids, D. (1996). Development and initial validation of the Multicultural Counseling Awareness Scale. In G. R. Sodowsky & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Multicultural assessment in counseling and clinical psychology (pp. 247-282). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
36. Porter, N. (1985). New perspective on therapy supervision. In L. B. Rosewater & L. E. A. Walker (Eds.), Handbook of feminist therapy (pp. 332-342). New York: Springer.
37. Porter, N. (1995). Supervision of psychotherapists: Integrating antiracist, feminist, and multicultural perspectives in psychotherapy: In H. Landrine (Ed.), Bringing cultural diversity to feminist psychology: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 163-176). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
38. Porter, N., & Vasquez, M. (1997). Covision: Feminist supervision, process, and collaboration. In J. Worell & N. Johnson (Eds.), Shaping the future of feminist psychology: Education, research, and practice (pp. 155-171). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
39. Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119-125.
40. Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5, 631-660.
41. Robinson, D. A. (1994). Therapy with women: Empirical validation of a clinical expertise. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
42. Robinson, D. A., & Worell, J. (1991). The therapy with women scale. Unpublished manuscript.
43. Schmidt, W. C. (1997). World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 2, 274-279.
44. Schoenholtz-Read, J. (1996). The supervisor as gender analyst: Feminist perspectives on group supervision and training. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 46, 479-500.
45. Stake, J. E., Roades, L., Rose, S., Ellis, E., & West, C. (1994). The women's studies experience: Impetus for feminist activism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 403-412.
46. th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
47. Thompson, B. (2000). Ten commandments of structural equation modeling. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 261-283). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
48. Warburton, J., Newberry, A., & Alexander, J. (1989). Women as therapists, trainees, and supervisors. In M. McGoldrick, C. M. Anderson, & F. Walsh (Eds.), Women in families: A framework for family therapy (pp. 152-165). New York: W. W. Norton.
49. West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables, InR. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56-75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. Wetter, D. W., Smith, S. S., Kenford, S. L., Jorenby, D. F., Fiore, M. C., Hurt, R. D., Offord, K. P. & Baker, T. B. (1994). Smoking outcome expectancies: Factor structure, predictive validity, and discriminant validity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 801-811.
51. Wheeler, D., Myers Avis, J., Miller, L. A., & Chaney, S. (1989). Rethinking family therapy training and supervision: A feminist model. In M. McGoldrick & C. M. Anderson (Eds.), Women in families: A framework for family therapy (pp. 135-151). New York: W. W. Norton.
52. Worell, J., & Oakley, D. R. (2000). Teaching as transformation: Resolving ethical dilemmas in feminist pedagogy. In M. M. Brabeck (Ed.), Practicing feminist ethics in psychology (pp. 167-187). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
53. Worell, J., & Remer, P. (1992). Feminist perspectives in therapy: An empowerment model for women. New York: Wiley.