The effects of audience reaction shots on attitudes towards controversial issues

Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 476-491

  Davis, Stacy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141572886     PISSN: 08838151     EISSN: 15506878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08838159909364505     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Aust, C.F., & Zillmann, D. (1996). Effects of victim exemplification in television news on viewer perception of social issues. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 787-803.
2. Drew, D., & Cadwell, R. (1985). Some effects of video editing on perceptions of television news. Journalism Quarterly, 62, 828-31.
3. Duck, S.W., & Baggaley, J. (1975). Audience reaction and its effect on perceived expertise. Communication Research, 2, 79-85.
4. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
5. Hylton, C. (1971). Intra-audience effects: Observable Audience Response. The Journal of Communication, 21, 253-265.
6. Landy, D. (1972). The effect of overheard audience's reaction and attractiveness on opinion change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 276-288.
7. Messaris, P., Eckman, B., & Gumpert, G. (1979). Editing structure in the televised versions of the 1976 presidential debates. Journal of Broadcasting, 23, 359-369.
8. Messaris, P. (1994). Visual literacy: Image, mind & reality. Boulder: Westview Press.
9. Morello, J.T. (1988). Argument and visual structuring in the 1984 Mondale-Reagan debates: The medium's influence on the perception of clash. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 52, 277-290.
10. Morello, J.T. (1991). Visual structuring of the 1976 and 1984 nationally televised presidential debates: Implications. Central States Speech Journal, 39, 233-243.
11. Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
12. Sullivan, D.G., & Masters, R.D. (1994). Biopolitics, the media, and leadership: Nonverbal cues, emotions, and trait attributions in the evaluation of leaders. Research in Biopolitics, 2, 237-273.
13. Tiemens, R. (1976). Television's portrayal of the 1976 presidential debates: An analysis of visual content. Communication Monographs, 45, 362-370.
14. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel and W.G. Austin (Eds), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd edition, pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
15. Whittaker, R. (1993). Television production. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
16. Wiegman, O. (1987). Attitude change in a realistic experiment: The effect of party membership and audience reaction during an interview with a Dutch politician. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 37-49.
17. Zettl, H. (1990). Sight, sound, motion: Applied media aesthetics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.