Mediated images of international understanding: The Case of India and the United States

Gazette

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 477-491

  Bublic, John M ^a   Sitaraman, Srinivasan ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

hegemony; journalists; media; news; Q methodology

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141572686     PISSN: 00165492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0016549298060006002     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Brown, S.R. (1980) Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2. Carragee, K.M. (1993) ‘A Critical Evaluation of Debates Examining the Media Hegemony Thesis’, Western Journal of Communication 57: 330-348.
3. Galtung, J. and M.H. Ruge (1965) ‘The Structure of Foreign News’, Journal of Peace Research 2: 64-91.
4. Gramsci, A. (1971) Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
5. Herman, E.S. and N. Chomsky (1988) Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon Books.
6. Lange, J.C. (1984) ‘National Development and News Values: The Press in the Third World and the West’, Gazette 33: 69-86.
7. Lee, C. (1989) ‘The Politics of International Communication: Changing the Rules of the Game’, Gazette 44(2): 75-91.
8. Stephenson, W. (1953) The Study of Behavior: The Q-Technique and its Methodology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9. Straughan, D.M. (1989) ‘An Experiment on the Relation Between News Values and Reader Interests’, Gazette 43: 93-107.