Changes in ecosystem carbon and nitrogen in a loblolly pine plantation over the first 18 years

Soil Science Society of America Journal

Volumn 67, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 1594-1601

  Johnson, D W ^a   Todd Jr , D E ^b   Tolbert, V R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CARBON; FORESTRY; NITROGEN;

FERTILIZATION;

ECOSYSTEMS;

BIOMASS; CARBON; GROWTH RESPONSE; NITROGEN; NUTRIENT CYCLING; PLANTATION;

PINUS TAEDA;

EID: 0141567769     PISSN: 03615995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2003.1594     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Bremner, J.M. 1996. Nitrogen-Total. p. 1085-1122. In D.L. Sparks (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. SSSA Book Ser. No. 5. SSSA, Madison, WI.
2. Compton, J.E., and R.D. Boone. 2000. Long-term impacts of agriculture on soil carbon and nitrogen in New England forests. Ecology 81:2314-2330.
3. Compton, J.E., R.D. Boone, G. Motzkin, and D.R. Foster. 1998. Soil carbon and nitrogen in pine-oak sand plain in central Massachusetts: Role of vegetation and land-use history. Oecologia 116:536-542.
4. Harris, W.F., R.A. Goldstein, and G.S. Henderson. 1973. Analysis of forest biomass pools, annual primary production, and turnover of biomass for a mixed deciduous forest watershed. p. 41-64. In H. Young (ed.) IUFRO biomass studies, mensuration, growth and yield. University of Maine Press, Orono, ME.
5. Harris, W.F., R.S. Kinerson, and N.T. Edwards. 1977. Comparison of belowground biomass of natural deciduous forest and loblolly pine plantations. Pedobiologia 17:369-381.
6. Jenkinson, D.S. 1991. The Rothamstad long-term experiments: Are they still of use? Agron. J. 83:2-10.
7. Johnson, D.W., and P.S. Curtis. 2001. Effects of forest management on soil carbon and nitrogen storage. Meta Analysis For. Ecol. Manage. 140:227-238.
8. Johnson, D.W., and D.E. Todd, Jr. 1988. Nitrogen fertilization of young yellow-poplar and loblolly pine plantations at differing frequencies. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52:1468-1477.
9. Johnson, D.W., and D.E. Todd, Jr. 1998. Harvesting effects on long-term changes in nutrient pools in a mixed oak forest. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62:1725-1735.
10. Johnson, D.W., and R.I. Van Hook. (ed.). 1989. Analysis of Biogeochemical Cycling Processes in Walker Branch Watershed. Springer-Verlag, New York. 401 p.
11. Knoepp, J.D., and W.T. Swank. 1997. Forest management effects on surface soil carbon and nitrogen. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61:928-935.
12. Lal, R., J. Kimble, and R. Follet. 1998. Land use and soil C pools in terrestrial ecosystems p. 1-10. In R. Lal et al.(ed.) Management of carbon sequestration in soil. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
13. Mann, L.K. 1986. Changes in soil carbon storage after cultivation. Soil Sci. 142:279-288.
14. Miller, H.G. 1981. Forest fertilization: Some guiding concepts. Forestry 54:157-167.
15. Morrison, I.K., and N.W. Foster. 1977. Fate of urea fertilizer added to a boreal forest Pinus banksiana Lain. Stand. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41:441-448.
16. Naidu, S.L., E.H. DeLucia, and R.B. Thomas. 1998. Contrasting patterns of biomass allocation in dominant an suppressed loblolly pine. Can. J. For. Res. 28:1116-1124.
17. Nelson, D.W., and L.E. Sommers. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. p. 661-1010. In D.L. Sparks (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. SSSA Book Ser. No. 5. SSSA, Madison, WI.
18. Post, W.M., T-H Peng, W.R. Emmanuel, A.W. King, V.H. Dale, and D.L. DeAngelis. 1990. The global carbon cycle. American Scientist 78:310-326.
19. Post, W.M., and K.C. Kwon. 2000. Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change: Processes and potential. Global Change Biology 6:317-327.
20. Ralston, C.W. 1973. Annual productivity in a loblolly pine plantation. p. 123-139 In H.E. Young (ed.) IUFRO biomass studies: Nancy, France and Vancouver, Canada. University of Maine, College of Life Sciences and Agriculture, Orono, ME.
21. Richter, D.D., D. Markewitz, S.E. Trumbore, and C.G. Wells. 1999. Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest. Nature 400:56-58.
22. Schimel, D.S. 1995. Terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle. Global Change Biology 1:77-91.
23. Schlesinger, W.H. 1990. Evidence from chronosequence studies for a low carbon-storage potential of soils. Nature 348:232-234.
24. Schlesinger, W.H. 1997. Biogeochemistry: An analysis of global change. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
25. Ter-Mikaelian, M.T., and M.D. Korzukhin. 1997. Biomass equations for sixty-five North Americal tree species. For. Ecol. Manag. 97:1-24.
26. Trettin, C.A., D.W. Johnson, and D.E. Todd, Jr. 1999. Forest nutrient and carbon pools at Waler Branch Watershed: Changes during a 21-year period. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63:1436-1448.
27. Turner, J., and M. Lambert. 2000. Change in organic carbon in forest plantation soils in eastern Australia. For. Ecol. Manage. 133:231-247.
28. Van Lear, D.H., P.R. Kapeluck, and M.M. Parker. 1995. Distribution of carbon in a Piedmont soil as affected by loblolly pine management. In McFee, W.W., and Kelly, J.M. (ed.). Carbon Forms and Functions in Forest Soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI, p. 489-502.
29. Van Lear, D.H., J.B. Waide, and M.J. Teuke. 1984. Biomass and nutrient content of a 41-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation on a poor site in South Carolina. Forest Sci. 30:395-404.
30. Velleman, P.F. 1997. DataDesk Version 6.0 Statistics guide. Data Description, Inc., Ithaca, NY.
31. 15N urea fertiliser applied to a recently thinned radiata pine stand on pumice soil. N.Z. J. For. Sci. 10:381-394.